<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:42:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Thanks, It&#039;s a good lens sometimes :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, It&#8217;s a good lens sometimes :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pentax</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Pentax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-160</guid>
		<description>Hey! Fantastic pictures! Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Fantastic pictures! Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-96</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s nice.  I just bought a S-M-C 5mm/1.8, that&#039;s probably very good too... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s nice.  I just bought a S-M-C 5mm/1.8, that&#8217;s probably very good too&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ovidiu</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Ovidiu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Hi there.
I had a Pentax 50mm f/1.4 and all I can say is that it&#039;s been an amazing lens. Despite the fact that was manual focus, the image quality was absolutely superb. Sharp like a razor blade and the colors where extremely punchy.
it worked without any problems on my Pentax K10D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there.<br />
I had a Pentax 50mm f/1.4 and all I can say is that it&#8217;s been an amazing lens. Despite the fact that was manual focus, the image quality was absolutely superb. Sharp like a razor blade and the colors where extremely punchy.<br />
it worked without any problems on my Pentax K10D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Ricard, thanks :) I don&#039;t know really - I want to compare them but did a mistake with the adapter for the C/Y last time I tried. I think the Yashica is a bit hard to focus, but it can be good when you get it right. The ML 50 is incredible, really sharp but with nice bokeh also! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricard, thanks :) I don&#8217;t know really &#8211; I want to compare them but did a mistake with the adapter for the C/Y last time I tried. I think the Yashica is a bit hard to focus, but it can be good when you get it right. The ML 50 is incredible, really sharp but with nice bokeh also! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Super images as usual Mattias! How does it compare to the Yashica 35mm? I had one of those many years ago and found it to be a very sharp lens, whereas the Pentax looks to me to be a more soft and dreamy effect. Both good in their own way will you do a comparison at some point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super images as usual Mattias! How does it compare to the Yashica 35mm? I had one of those many years ago and found it to be a very sharp lens, whereas the Pentax looks to me to be a more soft and dreamy effect. Both good in their own way will you do a comparison at some point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Lucky bastard ;)

www.kaffebrus.com

Swedish webshop with adapters and other camera accessories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucky bastard ;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kaffebrus.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.kaffebrus.com</a></p>
<p>Swedish webshop with adapters and other camera accessories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/08/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hello Mattias !

One short qustion... the adapter you use when you attache your old lenses to the Canon EOS 350D... where did you buy that ?

Last weekend a bought a &quot;systembolagspåse&quot; for 100 SEK at an fleemarket and the content was a Chinon CS with 2 leses, one 50mm 1.7 (i think) and one 135mm f2.8... the was also a Pentax P30 with some kind of zoomlens and a couple of flashes... A real bargain i think !

Regards, Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mattias !</p>
<p>One short qustion&#8230; the adapter you use when you attache your old lenses to the Canon EOS 350D&#8230; where did you buy that ?</p>
<p>Last weekend a bought a &#8220;systembolagspåse&#8221; for 100 SEK at an fleemarket and the content was a Chinon CS with 2 leses, one 50mm 1.7 (i think) and one 135mm f2.8&#8230; the was also a Pentax P30 with some kind of zoomlens and a couple of flashes&#8230; A real bargain i think !</p>
<p>Regards, Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
