<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; Expressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/category/expressions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bokeh &#8211; what is that?</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-what-is-that.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-what-is-that.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 18:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Expressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bokeh - If your starting out with photography and manual lenses, you will probably come a cross that word. The word comes from ”boke”, the Japanese word for blur. It is used to describe the part of a picture that are out of focus, and that the lens shows as blurred. Bokeh of lenses may have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Bokeh -</em> If your starting out with photography and manual lenses, you will probably come a cross that word. The word comes from ”boke”, the Japanese word for blur. It is used to describe the part of a picture that are out of focus, and that the lens shows as blurred. Bokeh of lenses may have very different aesthetic qualities. This is most apperent in larger apertures, when part of the picture is a lot out of focus. Soft edges on the blurry reflexes are often considered preferable!</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2733291524_0de93821a8_o.jpg"><img title="Bokeh of Helios 44-3" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3045/2733291524_32337ffb16_m.jpg" alt="Bokeh of Helios 44-3" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bokeh of Helios 44-3</p></div>
<p><strong>Some great reading about bokeh:</strong></p>
<p><a title="Bokeh-test" href="http://www.rickdenney.com/bokeh_test.htm">Great Bokeh-test from Rick Denney</a><br />
<a href="http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm" target="_blank">Ken Rockwell on bokeh</a><br />
<a title="Understanding bokeh" href="http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/bokeh.shtml" target="_blank">Understanding bokeh by Merklinger</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/cold-bokeh-with-yashica-ml-50mm14.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 8, 2009">Cold bokeh with Yashica ML 50mm/1.4</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 1, 2008">Review of Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 preset T2</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.599 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-what-is-that.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

