<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; Techniques</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/category/techniques/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poor photographers weather protection</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/poor-photographers-weather-protection.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/poor-photographers-weather-protection.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garphyttan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kilsbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yashica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend we had a snowstorm in Sweden, so I needed some poor photographers weather protection. So with a plastic bag and a rubber band wrapped around the lens I challenged the weather gods and took a photowalk with blowing winds and snow up to my waiste. The lens used was Yashica ML 50mm/2. Similar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This weekend we had a snowstorm in Sweden, so I needed some poor photographers weather protection. So with a plastic bag and a rubber band wrapped around the lens I challenged the weather gods and took a photowalk with blowing winds and snow up to my waiste. The lens used was Yashica ML 50mm/2.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2730/4375828795_8cd08941ed_o.jpg" title="Factory by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2730/4375828795_16b18d1a74.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Factory" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/point-your-lens-at-the-sun.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 2, 2010">Point your lens at the sun</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/colourphotos-with-yashica-j-7.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 12, 2008">Colourphotos with Yashica J-7</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 1, 2009">What makes a good picture?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/the-hazards-in-the-life-of-a-naturephotographer.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 8, 2009">The hazards in the life of a naturephotographer</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-setback.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 21, 2010">Spring setback</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.812 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/poor-photographers-weather-protection.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you need autofocus for moving objects</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/do-you-need-autofocus-for-moving-objects.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/do-you-need-autofocus-for-moving-objects.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 09:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you know I use manual focus, but do you need autofocus for moving objects? It&#8217;s an argument often raised by people when I write for exemple my article &#8220;5 resons to love manual lenses&#8221;. Well then, I guessmanual focusing is not a skill to learn, and I should really avoid photos like these since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know I use manual focus, but do you need autofocus for moving objects? It&#8217;s an argument often raised by people when I write for exemple my article <a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/12/manual-lenses/">&#8220;5 resons to love manual lenses&#8221;</a>. Well then, I guessmanual focusing is not a skill to learn, and I should really avoid photos like these since they are impossible to take with the lenses I use. Or&#8230;? ;) </p>
<p><small>(clicking on the images opens Flickr in a new window)</small></p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2837774086/" title="Garphyttans Hillrace by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3267/2837774086_e93d805a57_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Garphyttans Hillrace" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2345154392/" title="Flying swan by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3125/2345154392_b4b1a5bcf0_m.jpg" width="169" height="240" alt="Flying swan" /></a></div>
<p><span id="more-796"></span></p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2836939705/" title="Garphyttan Hillrace by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/2836939705_44335b78eb_m.jpg" width="184" height="240" alt="Garphyttan Hillrace" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3606335738/" title="Cruising in Garphyttan by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3345/3606335738_548810ca33_m.jpg" width="240" height="240" alt="Cruising in Garphyttan" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autofocus-to-photograph-moving-objects.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 22, 2008">No, you don&#8217;t need autofocus to photograph moving objects</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/manual-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 18, 2008">5 reasons I love manual lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 7.240 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/do-you-need-autofocus-for-moving-objects.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenfilter + Photoshop = Graphical</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/greenfilter-photoshop-graphical.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/greenfilter-photoshop-graphical.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenfilter and Photoshop? Greenfilters are yesterdays news. Nothing relevant for digital photography. Right? Well, besides that it can make skintones for black and white nicer and give some structure to images of green woods, I discovered a nice effect when I made a very graphical style photo by editing a greenfiltered image in Photoshop. Shoot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Greenfilter and Photoshop</em>? Greenfilters are yesterdays news. Nothing relevant for digital photography. Right? Well, besides that it can make skintones for black and white nicer and give some structure to images of green woods, I discovered a nice effect when I made a very graphical style photo by editing a greenfiltered image in Photoshop.</p>
<p>Shoot <strong>something green</strong> with a greenfilter on. It&#8217;s good to get light son your subject, since it probably have some red light in it.</p>
<div id="attachment_581" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 410px"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/img_7291.jpg" alt="Cherry Green" title="Cherry Green" width="400" height="400" class="size-full wp-image-581" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Cherry Green</p></div>
<p>In Photoshop make a <em>Adjustment Layer</em> with <em>Channel Mixer</em>, make <em>Monochrome</em> and build a black and white conversion using mainly the red channel (red channel almost 100, blue and green almost 0). Most things in the image will be black, except where the light is.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3081/3234895054_01f7423ec7_o.jpg"><img alt="Black and white pine" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3081/3234895054_ccf8239f02.jpg" title="Black and white pine" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Black and white pine</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/pidgins-with-super-takumar-135mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 12, 2009">Pidgins with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portraits-with-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2008">Portraits with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/black-and-white-vs-colour-%e2%80%93-part-2.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 30, 2009">Black and White vs Colour – part 2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/black-and-white-vs-colour-%e2%80%93-part-3.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 3, 2009">Black and White vs Colour – part 3</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/the-warm-and-cold.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 8, 2010">The warm and cold</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 11.391 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/greenfilter-photoshop-graphical.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, you don&#8217;t need autofocus to photograph moving objects</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/autofocus-to-photograph-moving-objects.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/autofocus-to-photograph-moving-objects.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 08:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a reaction to my post &#8220;5 reasons I love manual lenses&#8221; some responses on other sites was claiming you need, yes MUST have autofocus to shoot moving objects. This is, I guess, from people who haven&#8217;t tried and can not turn a ring. Sure. I have not shot birds, swallows in flight, racing cars&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a reaction to my post <a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/12/manual-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-229">&#8220;5 reasons I love manual lenses&#8221;</a> some responses on other sites was claiming you need, yes MUST have <strong>autofocus to shoot moving objects</strong>. This is, I guess, from people who haven&#8217;t tried and can not turn a ring. </p>
<p>Sure. I have not shot birds, swallows in flight, racing cars&#8230; <em>oh, but I wait I am mistaken</em>. I <em>have</em> photographed those things with manual focus. But the &#8220;newer is better myth&#8221; says it&#8217;s <strong>impossible</strong>. I wonder what more miracles I can perform? ;)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have time to find really good examples today, so just some I fetched from my flickr, but my point is that it takes some practise but it is possible. The swan is one of my first manual photos and not the greatest of images but it is in focus:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3267/2837774086_cdc33cca5b_o.jpg"><img title="Racing a cloudy, foggy day" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3267/2837774086_e93d805a57_m.jpg" alt="Racing a cloudy, foggy day" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Racing a cloudy, foggy day</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 179px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3125/2345154392_12478c523c_o.jpg"><img alt="Flying Swan, one of my first manual photos" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3125/2345154392_b4b1a5bcf0_m.jpg" title="Swan" width="169" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Flying Swan, one of my first manual photos</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/manual-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 18, 2008">5 reasons I love manual lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/do-you-need-autofocus-for-moving-objects.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 1, 2009">Do you need autofocus for moving objects</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 1, 2008">Review of Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 preset T2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.989 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/autofocus-to-photograph-moving-objects.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portraits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you like me &#8211; rather the one behind the camera the in front of it? However, sooner or later you will need a picture of yourself, right? For your company, CV, website, book &#8211; whatever. Well, I needed a couple of images for different occasions. So late tonight I took out the cameragear and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you like me &#8211; rather the one <strong>behind the camera</strong> the in front of it? However, sooner or later you will need a picture of yourself, right? For your company, CV, website, book &#8211; whatever.</p>
<p>Well, I needed a couple of images for different occasions. So late tonight I took out the cameragear and gave it a try.</p>
<ul>
<li>A chair</li>
<li>Two constructionlights (500W)</li>
<li>Tripod</li>
<li>Camera with m42-lens Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</li>
<li>A piece of string</li>
<li>Some Photoshopping</li>
</ul>
<p>I tied the string to the tripod and stretched it to the chair. Sitting on the chair I focused on the tripod. Without touching the focus I put the camera back on the tripod. <em>With the string I could tell where the focus in the image is.</em></p>
<p>I put selftimer on and ran back to the chair. Took the string to my eye (so it would be in focus). The lights were like I wanted them after several attempts. It&#8217;s a bit trial and error. I don&#8217;t have good flash or studiolights so I have to use whats available, but I think it turned out ok:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_d5d9e5050b_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img title="Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_f937caba09.jpg" alt="Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/factory-with-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 3, 2008">Factory with S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/retrocamera-lost-in-cyberspace.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 28, 2009">Retrocamera lost in cyberspace?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-wife-on-colourfilm-scanned-and-converted-to-black-and-white-daydreaming.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 7, 2009">My wife on colourfilm, scanned and converted to black and white. Daydreaming?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.867 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how-to]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you use a digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) with modern lenses, you can always go back and look in the Exif to see what lens you used for each picture. But with the manual, old lenses there is no Exif-data from the lens. So if I use my Canon EOS 350D on a photosession, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you use a digital single-lens reflex camera (DSLR) with modern lenses, you can always go back and look in the Exif to see <strong>what lens you used</strong> for each picture. But with the manual, old lenses <em>there is no Exif-data</em> from the lens. So if I use my Canon EOS 350D on a photosession, and 3 manual lenses &#8211; how do I remember which one I used for a single picture?</p>
<p>Well, I have come up with this rutine. Simple, I know &#8211; but useful. <strong>Take a picture of the lens before you mount it</strong>. If you use some kind of filter, take a picture when you mount it and when you dismount it and put it back in the bag.</p>
<p>Heres from my session the other day&#8230; I started with Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5. Added macroring to shoot some flowers.</p>
<div id="attachment_197" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-197" title="Add macroring" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_9198.jpg" alt="Add macroring" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Add macroring</p></div>
<p>I took my flower-pictures. Removed the macroring.</p>
<div id="attachment_198" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-198" title="Remove macroring" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_9210.jpg" alt="Remove macroring" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Remove macroring</p></div>
<p>Took some pictures without the macroring. Then changed to Yashica ML 35mm/2.8</p>
<div id="attachment_199" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 290px"><img class="size-full wp-image-199" title="Change to Yashica ML 35mm" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_9274.jpg" alt="Change to Yashica ML 35mm" width="280" height="280" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Change to Yashica ML 35mm</p></div>
<p><span id="more-196"></span></p>
<p>Shot some images. Changed back to Super Takumar.</p>
<div id="attachment_200" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-200" title="Changed back to Super Takumar" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_9335.jpg" alt="Changed back to Super Takumar" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Changed back to Super Takumar</p></div>
<p>A new change to Yashica ML 50mm/2. Well, I think you get the hang of it now? ;)</p>
<div id="attachment_201" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-full wp-image-201" title="Change to Yashica ML 50mm" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_9381.jpg" alt="Change to Yashica ML 50mm" width="300" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Change to Yashica ML 50mm</p></div>
<p><strong>Pros</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">You dont have to remember a thing&#8230; well, almost nothing.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">The pictures of lenses don&#8217;t need to be good, as long as you can see what they are.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Add keywords in your digital darkroom when you get home, then delete the pictures of lenses.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">You need to know which lens you started with.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Could be a bit clumsy when you&#8217;re in a hurry</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">You dont get the f-stop recorded, so you might want to take notes anyway.</span></li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumnleafs-with-yashica-dsb-50mm19.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 16, 2008">Autumnleafs with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 5, 2009">I discovered a new world 2008</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/point-your-lens-at-the-sun.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 2, 2010">Point your lens at the sun</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/yashica-guy-joe-marcel-wolff-interview.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 2, 2008">Yashica Guy (Joe Marcel Wolff) interview</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.858 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

