<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; Thoughts on photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/category/thoughts-on-photography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A window to 1946</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-window-to-1946.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-window-to-1946.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old photographs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandfather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a window back to 1946, when my grandfather took this photograph. The smallest boy to the left is my father, three years old at the time. My grandfather owned a Zeiss Ikonta bellowcamera which he took a lot of nice pictures with. My father later also photographed a lot and developed his own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a window back to 1946, when my grandfather took this photograph. The smallest boy to the left is my father, three years old at the time. My grandfather owned a Zeiss Ikonta bellowcamera which he took a lot of nice pictures with. My father later also photographed a lot and developed his own film. When I was a boy we had a darkroom in the basement. Now I use the camera as often as I can. I use old cameras and lenses which I combine with digital techniques.</p>
<div align="center"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/1946.jpg" alt="" title="1946" width="533" height="381" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-975" /><br /><small>Photography: Karl Wirf &copy; 1946, with Zeiss Ikonta</small></div>
<p>My daughter is not old enough to stand behind the camera yet, but she very interested in the camera and is a good little model with a pretty smile ;) </p>
<div align="center"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sara_oc_mathilde.jpg"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/sara_oc_mathilde-340x226.jpg" alt="" title="Sara och Mathilde" width="340" height="226" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-982" /></a><br /><small>Photography: Mattias Wirf &copy; 2010, with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</small></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/yashica-guy-joe-marcel-wolff-interview.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 2, 2008">Yashica Guy (Joe Marcel Wolff) interview</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/new-site-for-old-camera-gear.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 24, 2008">New site for old camera gear</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 17, 2008">How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.369 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-window-to-1946.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspired trip with the Helios 44-3</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/inspired-trip-with-the-helios-44-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/inspired-trip-with-the-helios-44-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I made an inspired trip with the Helios 44-3 the other day, after I got some questions from Ali in the comments to my review of the lens (one of my first manual lenses and reviews by the way). I got out early one morning, but the result was &#8230; ok. Since I have not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made an inspired trip with the Helios 44-3 the other day, after I got some questions from <a href="http://silent-lake.deviantart.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Ali</a> in the comments to my review of the lens (one of my first manual lenses and reviews by the way). I got out early one morning, but the result was &#8230; ok. Since I have not photographed for a while I guess I need to work some to get mojo back. But I&#8217;m quite happy with this shot, into the dawn with the MC Helios 44-3 58mm/2. It also made me photographer of the day at <a href="http://twitter.com/photoandpicture">twitter.com/photoandpicture</a>.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.ipernity.com/doc/mattiaswirf/8600816" target="_blank"><img src="http://u1.ipernity.com/15/08/16/8600816.80012080.560.jpg" width="374" height="560" alt="Dawn behind flower" border="0"/></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/black-throated-diver.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 10, 2009">Black-throated diver</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/back-after-an-accident.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 1, 2010">Back after an accident</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/helios-bubbles-in-blue.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 14, 2010">Helios bubbles in blue</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-mc-helios-44-3-58mmf2.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 4, 2008">Review of MC Helios 44-3 58mm/f2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/sometimes-we-are-just-stuck-on-repeat-anemone-hepatica.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Sometimes we are just stuck on repeat (Anemone hepatica)</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 8.834 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/inspired-trip-with-the-helios-44-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The range of a lens</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-range-of-a-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-range-of-a-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 05:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yashica ml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s quite fantastic what photos can be done in the artistic range of a lens. My Yashica ML 35mm/2.8 is a nice landscape lens but also very good for closeups, sometimes soft but in the picture below sparkling. In the springtime it nice for catching the flowers without that exaggerated wideangle that is so trendy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite fantastic what photos can be done in the artistic range of a lens. My Yashica ML 35mm/2.8 is a nice landscape lens but also very good for closeups, sometimes soft but in the picture below sparkling. In the springtime it nice for catching the flowers without that exaggerated wideangle that is so trendy now.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4654463433_75e6978ce8_b.jpg" title="IMG_0433 by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4041/4654463433_75e6978ce8.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_0433" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4034/4657035406_80e512d17c_b.jpg" title="Wood love by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4034/4657035406_80e512d17c.jpg" width="500" height="350" alt="Wood love" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 17, 2008">How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/cheap-yashica-lens-and-its-bokeh.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2008">Cheap Yashica lens and it&#8217;s bokeh</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.199 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-range-of-a-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/whooper-swans-with-super-takumar-135mm.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/whooper-swans-with-super-takumar-135mm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 07:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tysslingen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I bicycled round lake Tysslingen and made this image of whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens on Canon EOS 350D. The swans here are an attraction for wildlifephotographers every year, and they were lined up at the fence with their big tele AF-lenses&#8230; all getting the same image I guess, of the same birds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I bicycled round lake Tysslingen and made this image of whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens on Canon EOS 350D. The swans here are an attraction for wildlifephotographers every year, and they were lined up at the fence with their big tele AF-lenses&#8230; all getting the same image I guess, of the same birds and with the same weird look on their faces when they looked upon my little Takumar ;) </p>
<p align="center"><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4492840350_7299f6913f_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Swans at lake Tysslingen by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4009/4492840350_b7b94762d8.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="Swans at lake Tysslingen" /></a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-photography-wishlist.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">My photography wishlist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-day-with-tele-tokina-105mm2-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 11, 2010">A day with Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/stuck-on-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 12, 2009">Stuck on flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/image-with-tele-tokina.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 27, 2008">Wooden racecardriver-image with Tele-Tokina</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 1, 2008">Review of Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 preset T2</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.831 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/whooper-swans-with-super-takumar-135mm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autumn bokeh again</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year I get cought up in the autumn bokeh again, the leafs turning red. It is one year ago I did the same thing with the Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.9, this year it&#8217;s Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9. It&#8217;s bokeh suits me for this type of images. I just hope I can grow as photographer even if the motifs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year I get cought up in the autumn bokeh again, the leafs turning red. It is one year ago I did the same thing with the Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.9, this year it&#8217;s Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9. It&#8217;s bokeh suits me for this type of images. I just hope I can grow as photographer even if the motifs are the same ;) </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3923955292/" title="Autumn leaf - it that time again by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3055/3923955292_9df5b2bd0c.jpg" width="340" height="500" alt="Autumn leaf - it that time again" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/sometimes-we-are-just-stuck-on-repeat-anemone-hepatica.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Sometimes we are just stuck on repeat (Anemone hepatica)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/stuck-on-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 12, 2009">Stuck on flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 6, 2010">Autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.014 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes a good picture?</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder how you look upon this question, &#8220;What makes a good picture?&#8221;. I believe it is when the artist manage to communicate a feeling. This image of grass, I wanted to relay the sence off standing in a field with waving straws, the freedom. One might even start thinking about what happened to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how you look upon this question, &#8220;What makes a good picture?&#8221;. I believe it is when the artist manage to communicate a feeling. </p>
<p>This image of grass, I wanted to relay the sence off standing in a field with waving straws, the freedom. One might even start thinking about what happened to the straws not standing up any more: Crop field circle by aliens? Animals having a feast? Winds? </p>
<p>But the image is very simple. I have tried to cut out what I wanted to show and no distractions. That&#8217;s why I sometimes have a hard time with photographers who want the biggest effect out of everything, to use the most extreme angle or perspective or color just because they can not because the image needs it. It&#8217;s also why I have a hard time with photographers only concerned by technical qualities &#8211; they bore me to death. But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3767831237/" title="The field by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3174/3767831237_7bb7e9e2ac.jpg" width="355" height="500" alt="The field" /></a></div>
<p>This field was made with the 60&#8242;s M42-lens aus Jena Sonnar 135mm/3.5 zebra on Canon EOS 350D.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/black-throated-diver.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 10, 2009">Black-throated diver</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-bug-eating-upside-down.html" rel="bookmark" title="June 9, 2009">A bug eating upside down</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.556 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodachrome production to an end</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/kodachrome-production-to-an-end.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/kodachrome-production-to-an-end.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have read in several places now that Kodachrome production will end. I thought this was old news, but I might be suffering from deja vu. Sad, surely, but I have to admit I never actually used it. But that&#8217;s true for many old things which I love, I use them today instead. If you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read in several places now that Kodachrome production will end. I thought this was old news, but I might be suffering from deja vu. Sad, surely, but I have to admit I never actually used it. But that&#8217;s true for many old things which I love, I use them today instead. If you wan&#8217;t to read more there&#8217;s a <a href="http://forum.mflenses.com/the-end-of-kodachrome-t17917.html" target="_blank" class="external">thread on MFlenses</a>, feel free to give more source in the comments.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong><br />
<a href="http://homepage.1000words.kodak.com/default.asp?item=2388083&#038;CID=go&#038;idhbx=kodachrometribute" target="_blank" class="external">Tribute on Kodak</a><br />
<a href="http://blog.flickr.net/2009/06/22/dont-take-my-kodachrome-away/" target="_blank" class="external">On FLickr blog</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/production-of-singlecoated-takumars-refired.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 1, 2009">Production of singlecoated Takumars refired</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-camera-and-lens-testing-collection-on-flickr.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 25, 2008">My Camera and Lens-testing Collection on Flickr</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumnleafs-with-yashica-dsb-50mm19.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 16, 2008">Autumnleafs with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/new-website-tips.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 26, 2010">New website tips</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/mflenses-learn-more-about-manual-cameras-and-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 4, 2008">MFlenses &#8211; learn more about manual cameras and lenses</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.161 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/kodachrome-production-to-an-end.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is film dead? A thought and Ektar 120mm</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/is-film-dead-a-thought-and-ektar-120mm.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/is-film-dead-a-thought-and-ektar-120mm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film vs digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filmphotography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kodak ektar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim claims film is dead Jim was writing the other day that film is dead. But I&#8217;m not so sure. Small cameras shops and filmprocessing haven&#8217;t really been around here in Swedens smaller towns for a while, and interest is still catching on with young people. I have no proof of that, just a feeling [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jim claims film is dead</strong><br />
Jim was writing the other day that <a href="http://www.jmg-galleries.com/blog/2009/02/12/film-is-dead-no-really/" class="external" target="_blank">film is dead</a>. But I&#8217;m not so sure. Small cameras shops and filmprocessing haven&#8217;t really been around here in Swedens smaller towns for a while, and interest is still catching on with young people. I have no proof of that, just a feeling when discussing on the internet and watching price-development for used filmcameras in Sweden.</p>
<p>Good post though, Jim &#8211; interesting reading.</p>
<p><strong>New 120mm film</strong><br />
Kodak is <a href="http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/ektar/ektarIndex.jhtml" target="_blank" class="external" rel="nofollow">releasing the Ektar-film in 120mm format</a>. Wow, that is great news I think. Just to think that there is still film for my old bellow Agfa Isolette makes me happy :)</p>
<p><em>By the way&#8230;</em>, I&#8217;m no filmfanatic, I love digital too ;)<br />
<div id="attachment_98" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/img_8548-180x180.jpg" alt="Ripped film" title="Ripped film" width="180" height="180" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-98" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Ripped film</p></div></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-photography-wishlist.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">My photography wishlist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/linktip-kodachrome-article-in-new-york-times.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 22, 2008">Linktip: Kodachrome-article in New York Times</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/80-film-cameras-for-under-50-dollars.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2008">80 film cameras for under 50 dollars</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/yashica-guy-joe-marcel-wolff-interview.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 2, 2008">Yashica Guy (Joe Marcel Wolff) interview</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/scans-from-yashica-j-7-on-tri-x-images.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 27, 2008">Scans from Yashica J-7 on Tri-X images</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.843 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/is-film-dead-a-thought-and-ektar-120mm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes a good lens?</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artistic view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensquality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was thinking today about what makes a good lens? Well, I don&#8217;t believe there is a straight answer to that question. I know some photographers think in terms of resolution, sharpness and charts. But I don&#8217;t want to take images where everything is sharp, that would be boring to me eventhough I can respect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking today about <em>what makes a good lens</em>? Well, I don&#8217;t believe there is a straight answer to that question. I know some photographers think in terms of resolution, sharpness and charts. But I don&#8217;t want to take images where everything is sharp, that would be boring to me eventhough I can respect others who do that sort of thing. I don&#8217;t believe art can be measured in charts.</p>
<p>My point is what you look for in a lens <strong>is subjective</strong>, but here is what I like:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Bokeh</strong><br />
I started of as a painter (and still look upon myself as one eventhough it has been ages since I painted anything). I want soft transitions, a painty feeling. Bokeh is very important to me in a lens. I often try to use the contrast between soft and sharp.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3048569128_7032bfc694_o.jpg"><img alt="Butterbokeh of tha Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3048569128_56404c5508_m.jpg" title="Butterbokeh of tha Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Butterbokeh of tha Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
</li>
<li><strong>Build quality</strong><br />
My theory is if I like the feeling of the lens, holding it and looking trough it, I will take better pictures becuase I can feel comfortable with the tool. I like the feeling of the lenses I keep, if I don&#8217;t like the feel I usually sell it.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3198/3083622542_420ce2b161_o.jpg"><img alt="Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm 3.5-4.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3198/3083622542_20a1379d6a_m.jpg" title="Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm 3.5-4.5" width="240" height="170" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm 3.5-4.5</p></div>
</li>
<li><strong>Speed</strong><br />
A faster f-stop make the viewfinder brighter. This is important if you use <a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/12/manual-lenses/">manual lenses</a> like I do, brighter viewfinder means easier to focus. But sometimes there can be other reasons &#8211; some of my f3.5 lenses give a clearer, brighter viewfinder then others.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3112/3153567978_4488fc9de1_o.jpg"><img alt="Yashica ML 50mm/1.4" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3112/3153567978_1333f2688f_m.jpg" title="Yashica ML 50mm/1.4" width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yashica ML 50mm/1.4</p></div></li>
<li><strong>Colours</strong><br />
Contrasty, saturated? Actually I can see the use of most qualities here for different occasions, but I tend to like saturated colours or black and white photographs with good contrast.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3162/3048570274_82597806d6_o.jpg"><img alt="Colours of the S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3162/3048570274_d69524234d_m.jpg" title="Colours of the S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Colours of the S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</p></div></li>
<li><strong>Sharpness</strong><br />
Ok. Sometimes I want to make a sharp image to, or at least a part of it.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3214/3085045961_6d3d8dbc59_o.jpg"><img alt="Waterline with Yashica Zoom" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3214/3085045961_0d87224d5a_m.jpg" title="Waterline with Yashica Zoom" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Waterline with Yashica Zoom</p></div>
</li>
<li><strong>Peculiarity</strong><br />
Some lenses you just got to love. Like the Industar 50-2, small baby pancake and silly looking. Russian-improved tessar ;) That lens has personality.<br />
Or the Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 with it&#8217;s silver frontrim, it&#8217;s buttery bokeh and sharp details. Made by Tomioka.<br />
I guess the header for this paragraph could also be &#8220;personality&#8221;.<br />
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3025412578_9a43a151ae_o.jpg"><img alt="Industar 50-2 on Zenit ET" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3025412578_aabb286be3_m.jpg" title="Industar 50-2 on Zenit ET" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Industar 50-2 on Zenit ET</p></div></li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 6, 2010">Autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.066 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I discovered a new world 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yashicaforum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last year was a big one for my photography, I discovered a new world in 2008. I&#8217;m talking of manual lenses and old cameras, but also my own views and skills in photography. The start of this blog 24th July &#8211; Installation and first post (modest) on Retrocamera.net as an international version of my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last year was a big one for my photography, I discovered <strong>a new world</strong> in 2008. I&#8217;m talking of manual lenses and old cameras, but also my own views and skills in photography.</p>
<p><strong>The start of this blog</strong><br />
24th July &#8211; Installation and first post (modest) on Retrocamera.net as an international version of my swedish blog. At the end of the year &#8211; 21st December &#8211; I reached 4500 unique visitors on my article &#8220;<a title="5 reasons I love manual lenses" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/12/manual-lenses/" target="_self">5 reasons I love manual lenses</a>&#8221;</p>
<div id="attachment_545" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2008/12/manual-lenses/"><img class="size-full wp-image-545" title="Retrocamera article" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/bild-16.gif" alt="Retrocamera article" width="350" height="274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Retrocamera article</p></div>
<p><strong>Winning a contest</strong><br />
21st &#8211; 27th July I participated in a contest in Sweden which I won. One picture a day from nature, for seven days. Partly using manual gear. I was very proud of this, since the competition was some photographers I respect.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/sets/72157606635285291/"><img title="Set with the 7 images I won with" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3005/2747659134_1966ae2a30_m.jpg" alt="Set with the 7 images I won with" width="240" height="146" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Set with the 7 images I won with</p></div>
<p><strong>Circle of lenses</strong><br />
I started cheap last spring trying Pentacon 29mm/2.8 on and ended testing Yashica ML 50mm/1.4 on the same spot in the woods. I have reached a collection of lenses I like, except for long telephoto.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2312977456"><img title="With Pentacon 29mm in march 2008" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3272/2312977456_3b18b12e5d_m.jpg" alt="With Pentacon 29mm in march 2008" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">With Pentacon 29mm in march 2008</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3151201886/"><img title="With Yashica ML 50mm/1.4 december 2008" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3211/3151201886_cfaf9d45fc_m.jpg" alt="With Yashica ML 50mm/1.4 december 2008" width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">With Yashica ML 50mm/1.4 december 2008</p></div>
<p><strong>1000 posts on YashicaForum.com</strong><br />
During the year two brands in particular caught my attention, <em>Asahi</em> (Takumar) and <em>Yashica</em>. Asahi/Takumar/Pentax sites exists, but I wondered why there was no <a href="http://www.yashicaforum.com" target="_blank">YashicaForum.com</a> so I decided to start it. Before new year we reached over 1000 posts and 77 members.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a href="http://www.yashicaforum.com"><img title="YashicaForum" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/themes/retrocamera/images/yashicaforum.gif" alt="YashicaForum" width="180" height="92" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">YashicaForum</p></div>
<p><strong>What does 2009 have in mind? </strong><br />
Well, looks like I will participate in at least two exhibitions, of which one is my own. Me, me and myself ;)</p>
<h2><span style="color: #008080;">H<span style="color: #ff9900;">a</span><span style="color: #99ccff;">v</span><span style="color: #800080;">e</span> a <span style="color: #3366ff;">g</span><span style="color: #008000;">o</span><span style="color: #ff0000;">o</span><span style="color: #000000;">d</span> <span style="color: #3366ff;">y</span><span style="color: #ffcc00;">e</span><span style="color: #ff99cc;">a</span><span style="color: #ff00ff;">r</span> <span style="color: #000000;">2009</span>!</span></h2>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/500-posts-on-yashicaforumcom.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">500 posts on YashicaForum.com</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/yashica-guy-joe-marcel-wolff-interview.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 2, 2008">Yashica Guy (Joe Marcel Wolff) interview</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumnleafs-with-yashica-dsb-50mm19.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 16, 2008">Autumnleafs with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.633 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

