<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-74793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-74793</guid>
		<description>Hi there, great post. I recently purchased this lens for my canon and i have the adapter coming in. Does anyone know about this lens when using video on a dslr? how are the results considering its a of a slow lens?
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, great post. I recently purchased this lens for my canon and i have the adapter coming in. Does anyone know about this lens when using video on a dslr? how are the results considering its a of a slow lens?<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nasir rahim</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-66587</link>
		<dc:creator>nasir rahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-66587</guid>
		<description>Did you ever find the adaptor for the Takumar 135 and if so where and what brand did you find? Thanks for your timely response sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever find the adaptor for the Takumar 135 and if so where and what brand did you find? Thanks for your timely response sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S-M-C Takumar 135 mm f/3.5 &#124; cybermees photo</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-63370</link>
		<dc:creator>S-M-C Takumar 135 mm f/3.5 &#124; cybermees photo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-63370</guid>
		<description>[...] Les avis sur PentaxForum.com. Un article sur RetroCamera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Les avis sur PentaxForum.com. Un article sur RetroCamera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Melendez</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-28006</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Melendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 04:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-28006</guid>
		<description>Asahi Pentax Takumar 135mm f3.5 42mm Screw MT Lens
I just bought this one on eBay. Will it fit my Canon 5d with the adapter?
Thanks for your help,
Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asahi Pentax Takumar 135mm f3.5 42mm Screw MT Lens<br />
I just bought this one on eBay. Will it fit my Canon 5d with the adapter?<br />
Thanks for your help,<br />
Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gibbins</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-20122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gibbins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-20122</guid>
		<description>I own a super-takumar 1:3.5/135mm lens and would like to know the difference the auto or manual switch on it can make when attached to an Argus/Cosina STL 1000 camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a super-takumar 1:3.5/135mm lens and would like to know the difference the auto or manual switch on it can make when attached to an Argus/Cosina STL 1000 camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tak</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-12696</link>
		<dc:creator>tak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-12696</guid>
		<description>uuu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Wow, great information :) It does have a &quot;4&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great information :) It does have a &#8220;4&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-796</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-796</guid>
		<description>Based on its serial number, 846894, shown in one photo above, this lens has the original Super Takumar 135mm/3.5 lens formula (5 elements in 4 groups).  Somewhere around 1967, the design was changed to 4 elements in 4 groups.  Possibly, this gave the later design a different bokeh characteristic.  I think the original design also had &quot;4&quot; marked on the aperture ring between &quot;5.6&quot; and &quot;3.5&quot;, whereas the the later one lacked the &quot;4&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on its serial number, 846894, shown in one photo above, this lens has the original Super Takumar 135mm/3.5 lens formula (5 elements in 4 groups).  Somewhere around 1967, the design was changed to 4 elements in 4 groups.  Possibly, this gave the later design a different bokeh characteristic.  I think the original design also had &#8220;4&#8243; marked on the aperture ring between &#8220;5.6&#8243; and &#8220;3.5&#8243;, whereas the the later one lacked the &#8220;4&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-508</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-508</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I hope I&#039;ll get in the position where I can buy again :) The Jupiter sure looks interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I hope I&#8217;ll get in the position where I can buy again :) The Jupiter sure looks interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nuttall</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/comment-page-1#comment-503</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nuttall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631#comment-503</guid>
		<description>http://www.ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1150 there are a cuople of my images here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1150" rel="nofollow">http://www.ussrphoto.com/Forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1150</a> there are a cuople of my images here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

