<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 preset T2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-27089</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 21:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-27089</guid>
		<description>After reading your review, I&#039;ve been watching for Tele-Tokina lenses. As you say, they seem to be very rare; I had to wait a very long time before I found one (a Tele-Tokina 135/2.8). I&#039;ve been supremely impressed with it; it even outperforms my Super Takumar 135/3.5. The 15 aperture blades make for some great bokeh. Your website seems to be the only readily-available online information on these lenses, so thank you for sharing your experience. I would never have found this little gem without your review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading your review, I&#8217;ve been watching for Tele-Tokina lenses. As you say, they seem to be very rare; I had to wait a very long time before I found one (a Tele-Tokina 135/2.8). I&#8217;ve been supremely impressed with it; it even outperforms my Super Takumar 135/3.5. The 15 aperture blades make for some great bokeh. Your website seems to be the only readily-available online information on these lenses, so thank you for sharing your experience. I would never have found this little gem without your review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Vitela</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-16651</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Vitela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-16651</guid>
		<description>Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this before. So good to search out any individual with some authentic ideas on this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this website is something that&#039;s wanted on the internet, somebody with just a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this before. So good to search out any individual with some authentic ideas on this subject. realy thanks for starting this up. this website is something that&#8217;s wanted on the internet, somebody with just a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the web!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A day with Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 &#124; RetroCamera</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-8766</link>
		<dc:creator>A day with Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 &#124; RetroCamera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-8766</guid>
		<description>[...] before the snowstorm we have here, I took a day with Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 (old, rare, dented lens I got for free when I bought a package). I hiked up near my home, to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] before the snowstorm we have here, I took a day with Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 (old, rare, dented lens I got for free when I bought a package). I hiked up near my home, to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-815</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very nice lens, I should try and use it more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very nice lens, I should try and use it more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-797</guid>
		<description>I have a Mamiya Sekor SX 105mm/2.8 lens (M42 mount, auto diaphragm) which may have the same optical design.  More on this lens: 

http://freenet-homepage.de/stauber/mamiya-nc/m42_mamiya_sx_105_2.8.htm

Sears also offered a 105mm/2.8 lens in M42 mount.

Comment #8 in the following blog thread discusses the Tokina-Sears-Mamiya connections for 105mm/2.8 :
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/37037-auto-sears-105mm-f-2-8-m42-rare.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Mamiya Sekor SX 105mm/2.8 lens (M42 mount, auto diaphragm) which may have the same optical design.  More on this lens: </p>
<p><a href="http://freenet-homepage.de/stauber/mamiya-nc/m42_mamiya_sx_105_2.8.htm" rel="nofollow">http://freenet-homepage.de/stauber/mamiya-nc/m42_mamiya_sx_105_2.8.htm</a></p>
<p>Sears also offered a 105mm/2.8 lens in M42 mount.</p>
<p>Comment #8 in the following blog thread discusses the Tokina-Sears-Mamiya connections for 105mm/2.8 :<br />
<a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/37037-auto-sears-105mm-f-2-8-m42-rare.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/37037-auto-sears-105mm-f-2-8-m42-rare.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I was looking for information on this lens and yes you&#039;re right there isn&#039;t much on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I was looking for information on this lens and yes you&#8217;re right there isn&#8217;t much on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel Bouvigne</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Bouvigne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-489</guid>
		<description>This is a T/T2 mount lens. T/T2 is a threaded &quot;universal&quot; mount, while Adaptall/Adaptall2 is a bayonet &quot;universal&quot; mount only used by Tamron.
Tokina never produced any Adaptall lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a T/T2 mount lens. T/T2 is a threaded &#8220;universal&#8221; mount, while Adaptall/Adaptall2 is a bayonet &#8220;universal&#8221; mount only used by Tamron.<br />
Tokina never produced any Adaptall lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furbioso</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html/comment-page-1#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>Furbioso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=293#comment-417</guid>
		<description>I have &quot;exactly&quot; this lens, but in the front reads Hanimar Tele-lens. I agree, this lens is very sharp, more sharp than my Super-Takumar 105/2.8, Fujinon-T 105/2.8 and in the same league of the Tamron 90/2.5. The bokeh is good too. I buy this lens in Barcelona, with a bunch of M42 tele lens, for next to nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have &#8220;exactly&#8221; this lens, but in the front reads Hanimar Tele-lens. I agree, this lens is very sharp, more sharp than my Super-Takumar 105/2.8, Fujinon-T 105/2.8 and in the same league of the Tamron 90/2.5. The bokeh is good too. I buy this lens in Barcelona, with a bunch of M42 tele lens, for next to nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

