<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; 85mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/85mm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=1072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My lens Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42 is for sale (I have one S-M-C Takumar 85mm/1.8 which I will keep). It is in good, but used, condition. The color of some often touched places is a bit worn, as you can see on the images. It also has a little scratch on the &#8220;L&#8221; in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lens Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42 is for sale (I have one S-M-C Takumar 85mm/1.8 which I will keep). It is in good, but used, condition. The color of some often touched places is a bit worn, as you can see on the images. It also has a little scratch on the &#8220;L&#8221; in the &#8220;Lens made in Japan&#8221;-text, and on the &#8220;T&#8221; in &#8220;Super-Takumar&#8221;. </p>
<p>The price for the lens: $350, or £200, or €240. Add shipping-cost from Sweden.</p>
<p>Pictures of the lens<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223609/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7045/7026223609_af002a6796.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223609/" target="_blank">Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, 1</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223771/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7102/7026223771_0f2f982f00.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223771/" target="_blank">Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, 4</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/6880123820/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7045/6880123820_da6bbf2a73.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/6880123820/" target="_blank">Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, 3</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223641/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7269/7026223641_a6843dc8a9.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/7026223641/" target="_blank">Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, 2</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p>Some pictures with the lens:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/4540089042/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4007/4540089042_22d3410b3f.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/4540089042/" target="_blank">Spider on flower</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3904152730/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2669/3904152730_f2c2a50fc4.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3904152730/" target="_blank">Rose2</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3936619387/" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2433/3936619387_2b77fa03a5.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3936619387/" target="_blank">Mushroom in morninglight</a> by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/mattiaswirf/" target="_blank">Mattias Wirf</a>, on Flickr</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/sets/72157622164298073/with/3936619387/" target="_blank">More pictures with the lens, here.</a></p>
<p>Write a comment or mail me if you are interested.</p>
<div style="color: red; border: 1px solid #FF796F; background: #FFE1DF; -moz-border-radius: 5px; -webkit-border-radius: 5px; -khtml-border-radius: 5px; border-radius: 5px; padding: 8px 13px;"><strong>SOLD!</strong><br />The lens is sold.</div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-preset-takumar-135mm3-5-m42-model-1957.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 8, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Preset Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42 (model 1957)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-window-to-1946.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2010">A window to 1946</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/swedish-nature-shot-with-old-asahi-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2009">Swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/sold-my-s-m-c-takumar-300mmf4.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 10, 2008">Sold my S-M-C Takumar 300mm/f4</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.967 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have shot some autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, classic portrait M42-lens from Asahi (Pentax). I like the contrast of sharp leafs to soft bokeh. The autumn colors I love, but sometimes it pays to go black and white I think. Do the opposit to the common way, our your own routine. Similar Posts:What makes a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have shot some autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, classic portrait M42-lens from Asahi (Pentax). </p>
<p>I like the contrast of sharp leafs to soft bokeh. The autumn colors I love, but sometimes it pays to go black and white I think. Do the opposit to the common way, our your own routine.</p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/5056953830/" title="BW autumn by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4126/5056953830_e7542ce76a.jpg" width="500" height="500" alt="BW autumn" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/5051256037/" title="Caught by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4083/5051256037_3848783cf9.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="Caught" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.703 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Autumn bokeh again</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts on photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every year I get cought up in the autumn bokeh again, the leafs turning red. It is one year ago I did the same thing with the Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.9, this year it&#8217;s Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9. It&#8217;s bokeh suits me for this type of images. I just hope I can grow as photographer even if the motifs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year I get cought up in the autumn bokeh again, the leafs turning red. It is one year ago I did the same thing with the Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.9, this year it&#8217;s Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9. It&#8217;s bokeh suits me for this type of images. I just hope I can grow as photographer even if the motifs are the same ;) </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3923955292/" title="Autumn leaf - it that time again by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3055/3923955292_9df5b2bd0c.jpg" width="340" height="500" alt="Autumn leaf - it that time again" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/sometimes-we-are-just-stuck-on-repeat-anemone-hepatica.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Sometimes we are just stuck on repeat (Anemone hepatica)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/stuck-on-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 12, 2009">Stuck on flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 6, 2010">Autumn with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.377 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portrait of a magic lens</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-a-magic-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-a-magic-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 05:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Portrait of a magic lens, Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, on my old Spotmatic-camera. Asahi made great things &#8211; and still do perhaps, but I&#8217;ve only tested their old stuff :) More about Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 on PBase Similar Posts:Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8 Review of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portrait of a magic lens, Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9, on my old Spotmatic-camera. Asahi made great things &#8211;  and still do perhaps, but I&#8217;ve only tested their old stuff :) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3914925773/" title="Spotmatic with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2579/3914925773_e30d6eaeaa.jpg" width="500" height="349" alt="Spotmatic with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3916238979/" title="Sup-Tak 85/1.9 on Spotmatic again by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3490/3916238979_1082dbae5d.jpg" width="500" height="342" alt="Sup-Tak 85/1.9 on Spotmatic again" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbase.com/carpents/eq_85f19" target="_blank">More about Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 on PBase</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/auto-takumar-85mm18-on-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-on-pentax-spotmatic-beautiful-old-camera.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 9, 2008">Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 on Pentax Spotmatic &#8211; beautiful old camera</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.439 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-a-magic-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a reader could get the impression I like all lenses? ;) Well, I try to see the good and bad in them all, what to use them for, what properties do they have? But some are easier to love then others&#8230; The purchase I bought this lens Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 from my friend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe a reader could get the impression I like <strong>all</strong> lenses? ;) Well, I try to see the good and bad in them all, what to use them for, what properties do they have? But some are easier to love then others&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_432" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-432" title="Auto Takumar 85" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_3316.jpg" alt="Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Pentax Spotmatic Camera" width="500" height="355" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Pentax Spotmatic Camera</p></div>
<p><strong>The purchase</strong><br />
I bought this lens Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 from my friend Daniel together with another lens. I guess this was about 800 SEK (approximately 76€, $98, £66 at the moment of writing) of the price, a bargain because I have later seen it on ebay for about $200. This is in good condition, only problem was a little stiff aperture ring but it loosened up with some exercise. Normal wear on hood and mount. A couple of other friends here in Örebro also bought lenses from Daniel at the same time and he shipped them all to me, so we had a little package-opener party.<br />
<span id="more-431"></span><br />
<div id="attachment_433" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-433" title="AutoTak 85" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_6928.jpg" alt="Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="500" height="364" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div></p>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 is a M42-mounted lens. This means I can mount it on Canon EOS with an adapter. M42 also works with adapter on DSLRs from Pentax, Olympus ans Sony. It also work on all M42 screwmount cameras offcourse.</p>
<p>The optical design is 5 elements in 4 groups. It&#8217;s quite wide for an early Takumar lens, 55mm filterdiameter (smaller then many other 85mm-lenses though). It was produced 1960-1964. It has aperturering in the front, nothing I have though of that much, but now I kind of feel I like that design since I can hold the lens steady while changing aperture. Weight 330g. My copy came with an original hood. The whole thing is made of metal offcourse, no plastic feeling anywhere. It has a button which I can use to open the aperture temporarily, I seldom use it hough since I often shoot with his lens at wide apertures.</p>
<div id="attachment_434" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-434" title="AtoTak 85 side" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_6923.jpg" alt="Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 from side" width="500" height="375" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 from side</p></div>
<p><strong>Results<br />
</strong>This is probably the best lens I own. Sharp but the bokeh is <strong>fantastic</strong> &#8211; really soft even in flares. The Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 is good for portraits but also works great for naturephotography. It&#8217;s easy to isolate a sharp object to a milkysoft background. Close focus is 85cm, not great but ok. I like the focal length, on my EOS 350D the cropfactor makes it 136mm. Offcourse f-stop 1.8 is fast for a short telephoto.</p>
<p>I answered a question on Flickr earlier today, which lens I would pick if I could only keep one. The answer was Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8. In fact, the list below &#8220;cons&#8221; will be short since I can&#8217;t find many cons.</p>
<div id="attachment_435" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><img class="size-full wp-image-435" title="AutoTak 85 back" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_6924.jpg" alt="Mount of Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm f1.8" width="500" height="500" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Mount of Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm f1.8</p></div>
<p><strong>A note on later versions</strong><br />
The later <em>Super-Takumar</em> and <em>SMC</em> version, one with different f-stop (1.9) have a different optical formula. Some people say those are much better, I have even read advise to avoid the Auto-Takumar but I feel that&#8217;s a bit stupid and write it down to the &#8220;all things newer is better&#8221;-myth. Sure, they have more glass and coating &#8211; which make their properties different and in som ways &#8220;better&#8221;, but to disregard this fantistic Auto Takumar lens because of that is insane. For me it still outshines all other lenses I have tried including modern primes.</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><strong><strong><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3048569128_7032bfc694_o.jpg"><img title="Leaf with butter background" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3239/3048569128_56404c5508.jpg" alt="Leaf with butter background" width="333" height="500" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Leaf with butter background</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><strong><strong><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3114/2911972570_497064cfd5_o.jpg"><img title="Portrait of my daughter" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3114/2911972570_120d7c81d0.jpg" alt="Portrait of my daughter" width="333" height="500" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Portrait of my daughter</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><strong><strong><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3285/2994107865_5e90c5737a_o.jpg"><img title="Frozen leaf" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3285/2994107865_1d4f8678d7.jpg" alt="Frozen leaf" width="333" height="500" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Frozen leaf</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><strong><strong><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_d5d9e5050b_o.jpg"><img title="Selfportrait" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_f937caba09.jpg" alt="Selfportrait" width="333" height="500" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">Selfportrait</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 342px"><strong><strong><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_4ee4c707d8_o.jpg"><img title="In town" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_d5abfbd695.jpg" alt="In town" width="332" height="500" /></a></strong></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">In town</p></div>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Pros<br />
</strong><span style="color: #339966;">+ Best bokeh ever<br />
+ Fast f-stop, clear viewfinder image<br />
+ Build quality&#8230; metal&#8230; solid like a tank.<br />
+ Size (from what I&#8217;ve read most 85s are larger).<br />
+ Button to let you temporarily open the &#8220;springloaded&#8221; aperture while focusing.</span></p>
<p><strong>Cons<br />
</strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">- Stiff aperture in my copy<br />
- If it&#8217;s really important to you, I guess single-coating is a con. But I haven&#8217;t noticed it.</span></p>
<p><strong>Reading</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Pentax_Takumar_85mm.html" target="_blank">http://www.taunusreiter.de/Cameras/Pentax_Takumar_85mm.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/showproduct.php?product=284" target="_blank">http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/showproduct.php?product=284</a> (they have mixed it up with Super-Multi-Coated)<br />
<a href="http://forum.takumar.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;t=48" target="_blank">http://forum.takumar.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&amp;t=48</a><br />
<em>New: <a href="http://www.mflenses.com/auto-takumar-85mm-1.8-lens-review.html" target="_blank">Asahi Pentax Auto Takumar 85mm f/1.8 Lens Review on MFLenses</a></em></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2009">Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.490 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Icephotography by Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 wideopen</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/icephotography-by-auto-takumar-85mm18-wideopen.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/icephotography-by-auto-takumar-85mm18-wideopen.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wideopen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Took some iceshots on my wlk the other day :) Similar Posts:Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 Another portrait with cameralens Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 (m42 screwmount) Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took some iceshots on my wlk the other day :)</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3074/3047732405_2f677bdfd3_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Icebubbles made with Asahi Opt.Co. Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3074/3047732405_74054a008f.jpg" title="Icebubbles made with Asahi Opt.Co. Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="500" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Icebubbles made with Asahi Opt.Co. Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/auto-takumar-85mm18-on-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2008">In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/another-portrait-with-cameralens-auto-takumar-85mm18-m42-screwmount.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Another portrait with cameralens Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 (m42 screwmount)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2009">Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.647 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/icephotography-by-auto-takumar-85mm18-wideopen.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another portrait with cameralens Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 (m42 screwmount)</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-portrait-with-cameralens-auto-takumar-85mm18-m42-screwmount.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-portrait-with-cameralens-auto-takumar-85mm18-m42-screwmount.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portraits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Similar Posts:Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42 Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8 Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 369px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3294/3042335888_f8b0499ee2_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Sara my wife" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3294/3042335888_641a1f607c.jpg" title="Sara my wife" width="359" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sara my wife</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/auto-takumar-85mm18-on-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2008">In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.346 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-portrait-with-cameralens-auto-takumar-85mm18-m42-screwmount.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portraits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you like me &#8211; rather the one behind the camera the in front of it? However, sooner or later you will need a picture of yourself, right? For your company, CV, website, book &#8211; whatever. Well, I needed a couple of images for different occasions. So late tonight I took out the cameragear and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you like me &#8211; rather the one <strong>behind the camera</strong> the in front of it? However, sooner or later you will need a picture of yourself, right? For your company, CV, website, book &#8211; whatever.</p>
<p>Well, I needed a couple of images for different occasions. So late tonight I took out the cameragear and gave it a try.</p>
<ul>
<li>A chair</li>
<li>Two constructionlights (500W)</li>
<li>Tripod</li>
<li>Camera with m42-lens Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</li>
<li>A piece of string</li>
<li>Some Photoshopping</li>
</ul>
<p>I tied the string to the tripod and stretched it to the chair. Sitting on the chair I focused on the tripod. Without touching the focus I put the camera back on the tripod. <em>With the string I could tell where the focus in the image is.</em></p>
<p>I put selftimer on and ran back to the chair. Took the string to my eye (so it would be in focus). The lights were like I wanted them after several attempts. It&#8217;s a bit trial and error. I don&#8217;t have good flash or studiolights so I have to use whats available, but I think it turned out ok:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_d5d9e5050b_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img title="Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3186/3038866807_f937caba09.jpg" alt="Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Selfportrait with Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/factory-with-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 3, 2008">Factory with S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/retrocamera-lost-in-cyberspace.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 28, 2009">Retrocamera lost in cyberspace?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-wife-on-colourfilm-scanned-and-converted-to-black-and-white-daydreaming.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 7, 2009">My wife on colourfilm, scanned and converted to black and white. Daydreaming?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.867 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Takumar photographs in the night</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of takumar-lenses used in the darkness of the night in this photographs. The first with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 and the second Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8, both on Canon EOS 350D. Similar Posts:Good read about M42-lenses A photowalk on 1 november Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42 Upcoming lensreview Review of Asahi Auto Takumar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of takumar-lenses used in the darkness of the night in this photographs. The first with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 and the second Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8, both on Canon EOS 350D.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_4eb3684282_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_1bdd78aa66.jpg" title="Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5" width="500" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 342px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_4ee4c707d8_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_d5abfbd695.jpg" title="House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="332" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-photowalk-on-1-november.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2008">A photowalk on 1 november</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 1, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/upcoming-lensreview.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2009">Upcoming lensreview</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.668 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr-set with images from the Auto-Tak 85mm</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/flickr-set-with-images-from-the-auto-tak-85mm.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/flickr-set-with-images-from-the-auto-tak-85mm.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto-takmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Similar Posts:Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8 Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42 In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center">
<object width="400" height="300"><param name="flashvars" value="&#038;offsite=true&#038;intl_lang=en-us&#038;page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Fmattiaswirf%2Fsets%2F72157607700450947%2Fshow%2F&#038;page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Fmattiaswirf%2Fsets%2F72157607700450947%2F&#038;set_id=72157607700450947&#038;jump_to="></param><param name="movie" value="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=61927"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.flickr.com/apps/slideshow/show.swf?v=61927" allowFullScreen="true" flashvars="&#038;offsite=true&#038;intl_lang=en-us&#038;page_show_url=%2Fphotos%2Fmattiaswirf%2Fsets%2F72157607700450947%2Fshow%2F&#038;page_show_back_url=%2Fphotos%2Fmattiaswirf%2Fsets%2F72157607700450947%2F&#038;set_id=72157607700450947&#038;jump_to=" width="400" height="300"></embed></object>
</div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/auto-takumar-85mm18-on-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2009">Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/in-front-of-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2008">In front of Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.407 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/flickr-set-with-images-from-the-auto-tak-85mm.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

