<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; c/y-mount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/cy-mount/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c/y-mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yashica ml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction As you might now I&#8217;m a fan of Yashica cameras and lenses (the reason I started YashicaForum.com offcourse). It all started out with a couple of old rangefinders and reading about the greatness of ML-series of lenses on forum.mflenses.com &#8230; at the time I think it was the ML 24mm that was being discussed. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Introduction</strong><br />
As you might now I&#8217;m a fan of Yashica cameras and lenses (the reason I started YashicaForum.com offcourse). It all started out with a couple of old rangefinders and reading about the greatness of ML-series of lenses on forum.mflenses.com &#8230; at the time I think it was the ML 24mm that was being discussed. I decided to get an adapter for Contax/Yashica and try this manual lenses on my Canon DSLR.</p>
<div id="attachment_378" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5836.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-378" title="Yashica ML 50mm/2 Front" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5836.jpg" alt="Yashica ML 50mm/2 Front" width="500" height="401" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yashica ML 50mm/2 Front</p></div>
<p><strong>The purchase</strong><br />
I got this lens from Richard for free &#8211; thanks :) I also bought one on swedish ebay Tradera, just because it was so cheap and I didn&#8217;t wan&#8217;t it to go unsold. They are easy to find, buy one if you can!</p>
<div id="attachment_379" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5828.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-379" title="Side of the lens Yashica ML 50mm/f2" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5828.jpg" alt="Side of the lens Yashica ML 50mm/f2" width="500" height="441" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Side of the lens Yashica ML 50mm/f2</p></div>
<p><span id="more-377"></span></p>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
This is perhaps the most common Yashica ML 50mm lens, but there are other faster versions also f1.4, f1.7, f1.9. It is small in size. The build quality seems good &#8211; turning rings feels smooth and reminds me of the feeling with some Pentax-lenses. It is multicoated and fully manual (it has no auto/manual-swtich or preset or anything like that). It is Contax/Yashica-mount so you need such a camera or adapter. I have used the lens on a Canon EOS 350D, for which I bought an adapter from China.</p>
<div id="attachment_381" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5833.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-381" title="Mount of this manual lens" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5833-340x329.jpg" alt="Mount of this manual lens" width="340" height="329" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mount of this manual lens</p></div>
<p><strong>Results</strong><br />
It&#8217;s very sharp. The bokeh is soft and wideopen it reminds me of some russian lenses, with almost a spinning feeling in the background. Good saturated colours. It gives a clear bright image in the viewfinder to focus on. Imagewise I can&#8217;t find anything to complain about with this lens.</p>
<div id="attachment_383" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 349px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5827.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-383" title="Yashica ML 50 f2 from front" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/img_5827-339x339.jpg" alt="Yashica ML 50 f2 from front" width="339" height="339" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Yashica ML 50 f2 from front</p></div>
<p>The Yashica ML 50mm/2 is small. The size feels nice but there is one thing that can be annoying sometimes: the aperturering is the most inner thing on the lens, that is it sist nearest the camerabody and can be hard to get a grip on. The focusring is easy to grip and feels very well built.</p>
<p>As mentioned above there are faster Yashica ML 50mm. However, I think many underestimates this lens because it&#8217;s the slowest in the series. In fact I think it can match many faster lenses I&#8217;ve tried.</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3009/2951474085_3b0436273b_o.jpg"><img title="Bokeh example" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3009/2951474085_1ec9bb6083.jpg" alt="Bokeh example" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bokeh example</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3176/2876394568_8424120feb_o.jpg"><img title="Long exposure on water" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3176/2876394568_d05e4081dc.jpg" alt="Long exposure on water" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Long exposure on water</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3194/2739034795_9f6eda45ed_o.jpg"><img title="Tree and branch" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3194/2739034795_6d8124f930.jpg" alt="Tree and branch" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tree and branch</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/2926612607_dd107e1e46_o.jpg"><img title="Autumn tree" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/2926612607_03d5682fb1.jpg" alt="Autumn tree" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Autumn tree</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3223/2994948148_0268f77487_o.jpg"><img title="Ice with bokeh" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3223/2994948148_57a818e6b8.jpg" alt="Ice with bokeh" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ice with bokeh</p></div>
<p>Post your Yashica ML 50mm/2 images on <a href="http://www.yashicaforum.com" target="_blank">YashicaForum.com</a> :)</p>
<p><strong>Pros</strong><br />
<span style="color: green;"><br />
+ Sharp, like most wide and normal ML-lenses I&#8217;ve tried.<br />
+ Good bokeh, similar to some expensive russian lenses.<br />
+ Saturated colours.<br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>Cons</strong><br />
<span style="color: red;"><br />
- Not the fastest 50mm lens, but f2 is often enough.<br />
- Aperture ring very close mount (and therefore camerabody).<br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>Reading &amp; images</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/ml_50mm_f2" target="_blank">On pbase</a><br />
<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/sets/72157606579721980/" target="_blank">My flickr-set</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.231 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap Yashica lens and it&#8217;s bokeh</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/cheap-yashica-lens-and-its-bokeh.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/cheap-yashica-lens-and-its-bokeh.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c/y-mount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dsb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yashica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DSB range of the Yashica brand is not supposed to be that good. It was their lowcost alternative and single coated. But this Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9 has surprised me a lot. I love the ML 50mm/2, but it would be hard to compare these two. The DSB is a little bigger which makes it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DSB range of the Yashica brand is not supposed to be that good. It was their lowcost alternative and single coated. But this Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9 has surprised me a lot. I love the ML 50mm/2, but it would be hard to compare these two. The DSB is a little bigger which makes it easier to handle the rings.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3179/2943675385_f0a3593142_o.jpg" rel="external"><img title="Flowers with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3179/2943675385_1361e2d326.jpg" alt="Flowers with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Flowers with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</p></div>
<p>I will soon post some more on the yashicaforum.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-tele-tokina-105mm28-preset-t2.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 1, 2008">Review of Tele-Tokina 105mm/2.8 preset T2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumnleafs-with-yashica-dsb-50mm19.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 16, 2008">Autumnleafs with Yashica DSB 50mm/1.9</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/manual-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 18, 2008">5 reasons I love manual lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.006 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/cheap-yashica-lens-and-its-bokeh.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

