<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; pentacon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/pentacon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Anemone nemorosa with the solid Pentacon 50/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/anemone-nemorosa-with-the-solid-pentacon-501-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/anemone-nemorosa-with-the-solid-pentacon-501-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anemone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=1025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another Anomone Nemorosa (wood anemone), this time photographed with Pentacon 50mm/1.8 on Canon EOS 350D. A lens I use bicycling when I wnat an allround that can be used for closeups. Wood anemones are everywhere now. With some blue spots of Hepatica nobilis. Similar Posts:Wood anemones and sun with Yashica ML 35mm/2.8 Spring with Pentacon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Anomone Nemorosa (wood anemone), this time photographed with Pentacon 50mm/1.8 on Canon EOS 350D. A lens I use bicycling when I wnat an allround that can be used for closeups. Wood anemones are everywhere now. With some blue spots of Hepatica nobilis.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/pentacon-anemone.jpg"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/pentacon-anemone-340x248.jpg" alt="" title="pentacon-anemone" width="340" height="248" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1026" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wood-anemones-and-sun-with-yashica-ml-35mm2-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 28, 2011">Wood anemones and sun with Yashica ML 35mm/2.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2010">Spring with Pentacon</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 18, 2011">Preset Asahi-lens and flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/hepatica-nobilis-with-super-takumar-28mm35-and-macroring.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 16, 2009">Hepatica nobilis with Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 and macroring</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/even-closer-with-the-super-takumar-28mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Even closer with the Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 9.106 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/anemone-nemorosa-with-the-solid-pentacon-501-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring with Pentacon</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flowers are starting to grow, and I wanted to portrait the spring with Pentacon 50/1.8. This is the years first flowershot, a hepatica nobilis. Not to sharp, could be due to my bicycling 30km before shooting it ;) Similar Posts:Anemone nemorosa with the solid Pentacon 50/1.8 Early spring flower with preset Takumar lens Hepatica [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flowers are starting to grow, and I wanted to portrait the spring with Pentacon 50/1.8. This is the years first flowershot, a hepatica nobilis. Not to sharp, could be due to my bicycling 30km before shooting it ;) </p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4057/4515559144_a1ab5c8f1f_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Hepatica Nobilis 1, 2010 by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4057/4515559144_4afbd651e9_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Hepatica Nobilis 1, 2010" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/anemone-nemorosa-with-the-solid-pentacon-501-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 20, 2011">Anemone nemorosa with the solid Pentacon 50/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2011">Early spring flower with preset Takumar lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/hepatica-nobilis-with-super-takumar-28mm35-and-macroring.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 16, 2009">Hepatica nobilis with Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 and macroring</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/even-closer-with-the-super-takumar-28mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Even closer with the Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 11.726 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praktica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife came home from the fleamarket run by the salvation army in Sweden, &#8220;Myrornas&#8221; (transl. &#8220;The ants&#8221;). She had found a Praktica LTL with Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8 attached. There were a few problems, dented filter threads and stiff focus, but otherwise good and all for about $6. The dented filter threads I solved by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife came home from the fleamarket run by the salvation army in Sweden, &#8220;Myrornas&#8221; (transl. &#8220;The ants&#8221;). She had found a Praktica LTL with Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8 attached. There were a few problems, dented filter threads and stiff focus, but otherwise good and all for about $6.</p>
<div><a title="Praktica LTL with Pentacon Auto 59mm/1.8" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-834" title="pentacon-50-18" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18-340x236.jpg" alt="pentacon-50-18" width="340" height="236" /></a></div>
<p>The dented filter threads I solved by smashing an old filter and putting in place (some violence included) and then attaching the generic lens hood on. The close focus limit of this lens is quite amazing, you can get very close without any extra tools. The lubrication in mine doesn&#8217;t seem to agree with swedish cold weather, it gets stiff. Optical geeks: the composition is 6 elements in 4 groups</p>
<p><span id="more-831"></span></p>
<p>If you want to read up on VEB Pentacon, there is <a class="external" rel="external" href="http://www.camerapedia.org/wiki/Pentacon" target="_blank">an article on Camerapedia</a>.</p>
<div><a title="Pentacon 50mm/1.8 front lens" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-832" title="pentacon-50-18-2" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18-2-340x294.jpg" alt="pentacon-50-18-2" width="340" height="294" /></a></div>
<p><strong>My thoughts</strong></p>
<p>I should perhaps not like this lens, it&#8217;s not concidered as one of the desirables amongst the collectors, but I love it. I think it is fantastic for close-ups. The soft bokeh is great, the swirly feeling when you shoot landscapes with the lens wide open, the sharpness is enough for me.</p>
<div><a title="Pentacon Auto 50mm f1.8 M42-lens side" rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18-3.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-836" title="pentacon-50-18-3" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pentacon-50-18-3-340x294.jpg" alt="pentacon-50-18-3" width="340" height="294" /></a></div>
<p>I have made some of my favorite images with this lens, a lens for $3 (if you count it half of the price, and the camera half of the price). The low value and dented parts also makes it a good lens to have on the camera when I move around.</p>
<p><strong>Pros</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Amazing bokeh</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Good close focus (0,33 m)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Swirly effect when wideopen and using some range</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Can be sharp enough</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">My copy has some mechanical problems</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Stopping down button could be a problem for some</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Smallest aperture only f16 </span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/4019921466_e1cca75e4c_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Sun through leafs 3 by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/4019921466_141a1d9fe9_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Sun through leafs 3" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2584/4009229391_2b3841b7eb_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Sun through leafs 2 by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2584/4009229391_b4e1158d99_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Sun through leafs 2" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2527/3977755658_b9f999ce4f_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="227 by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2527/3977755658_e282d8c2cf_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="227" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4009340693_5985734a60_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Sun through leafs by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4009340693_92720edbb2_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Sun through leafs" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2475/3849052124_084b92d89f_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Mushroom on the ground by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2475/3849052124_112fe8c1c8_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Mushroom on the ground" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2369/3848260715_bbd7d32b0e_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Mushroom with soft back by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2369/3848260715_621bfa62d5_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Mushroom with soft back" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2489/3825119657_b9848b0e97_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Garphyttan by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2489/3825119657_cd981041bb_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Garphyttan" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2482/3825921128_04da047968_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Happy by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2482/3825921128_9dd6df866c_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Happy" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3379260475_124322d06a_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Pentacon tulip by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3379260475_6709ac3d4f_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Pentacon tulip" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3335903329_7f7b18bbec_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Dam that river by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3335903329_fd69d2a575_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Dam that river" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3363/3450337304_75aa5cfdc5_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Branch in morning by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3363/3450337304_ea6e127b57_m.jpg" width="240" height="240" alt="Branch in morning" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2526/3977756138_e0eefc71fb_o.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Autumn colours by Mattias Wirf (PhotoSitesCenter.com), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2526/3977756138_67a2737e79_m.jpg" width="200" height="240" alt="Autumn colours" /></a></div>
<p><strong>More reading</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.praktica-users.com/lens/mlenses/morp1.8_50.html">http://www.praktica-users.com/lens/mlenses/morp1.8_50.html</a></li>
<li><a href="http://m42.artlimited.net/lens_detail.php?lid=66">http://m42.artlimited.net/lens_detail.php?lid=66</a></li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/buy-used-cameras-and-lenses-on-ebay.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 31, 2008">Checklist before you buy used cameras and lenses on ebay</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 11.605 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lighting a Pentacon lens</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/lighting-a-pentacon-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/lighting-a-pentacon-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-coated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I took my old Pentacon 50mm/1.8 and pointed it to the sun. Behind the leafs I could control the visual effects a bit. I wanted to do something different then all the pictures of autumnleafs I do every year. Similar Posts:Tha random post box plugin Autumn bokeh again Some summer closeups from a field [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I took my old Pentacon 50mm/1.8 and pointed it to the sun. Behind the leafs I could control the visual effects a bit. I wanted to do something different then all the pictures of autumnleafs I do every year.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2584/4009229391_2b3841b7eb_o.jpg" title="IMG_6775 by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2584/4009229391_b4e1158d99.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_6775" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4009340693_5985734a60_o.jpg" title="IMG_6770 by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2551/4009340693_92720edbb2.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_6770" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tha-random-post-box-plugin.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 13, 2010">Tha random post box plugin</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/autumn-bokeh-again.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2009">Autumn bokeh again</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/some-summer-closeups-from-a-field.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 24, 2009">Some summer closeups from a field</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2010">Spring with Pentacon</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 5, 2009">I discovered a new world 2008</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 9.654 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/lighting-a-pentacon-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A bug eating upside down</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-bug-eating-upside-down.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-bug-eating-upside-down.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 06:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a plant which is eatable, not only to humans obviously but to bugs too ;) The image was made woth Pentacon 50mm/1.8 m42 lens with zebra-look on a Canon EOS 350D. Similar Posts:What makes a good picture? Whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42 Another Aquilegia vulgaris [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a plant which is eatable, not only to humans obviously but to bugs too ;) The image was made woth Pentacon 50mm/1.8 m42 lens with zebra-look on a Canon EOS 350D.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3308/3609302361_c60648a2d0_o.jpg"><img alt="Bug eating plant" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3308/3609302361_6e53a94ca5.jpg" title="Bug eating plant" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bug eating plant</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 1, 2009">What makes a good picture?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/whooper-swans-with-super-takumar-135mm.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 5, 2010">Whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/another-aquilegia-vulgaris.html" rel="bookmark" title="June 21, 2009">Another Aquilegia vulgaris</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 11.887 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-bug-eating-upside-down.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miracles from the fleemarket &#8211; Pentacon tulip</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/miracles-from-the-fleemarket-pentacon-tulip.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/miracles-from-the-fleemarket-pentacon-tulip.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praktica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Pentacon 50/1.8 lens my wife brought home from the fleemarket is growing on me. It cost very little together with the Praktica-camera, and was a bit smashed in the filterthreads (I fixed this brutally by forcing a broken filters ring on the front on the lens = new filterthreads). Maybe you saw the bokeh-shots? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Pentacon 50/1.8 lens my wife brought home from the fleemarket is growing on me. It cost <em>very</em> little together with the Praktica-camera, and was a bit smashed in the filterthreads (I fixed this brutally by forcing a broken filters ring on the front on the lens = new filterthreads). <a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2009/03/bokeh-from-pentacon-50mm18/">Maybe you saw the bokeh-shots</a>? Well, here&#8217;s a tulip I shot at my wifes exhibition.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3379260475_124322d06a_o.jpg"><img alt="Pentacon tulip" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3622/3379260475_6709ac3d4f.jpg" title="Pentacon tulip" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentacon tulip</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/fixing-a-super-takumar-135mm35-from-wobbling-hood.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 9, 2009">Fixing a Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 from wobbling hood</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/newcomer-praktica-ltl-with-pentacon-50mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 8, 2009">Newcomer &#8211; Praktica LTL with Pentacon 50mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/the-mysterious-dive.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 11, 2008">The mysterious dive</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/exhibit-chiaroscuro-in-orebro-sweden.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 29, 2009">Exhibit &#8220;Chiaroscuro&#8221; in Örebro, Sweden</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.139 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/miracles-from-the-fleemarket-pentacon-tulip.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some bokeh from the Pentacon 50mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-from-pentacon-50mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-from-pentacon-50mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastgerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really like the bokeh of many manual lenses. I gave this Pentacon (previous Meyer) a try, and loved it too. These f1.7-f2 lenses are easier to use then the f1.4 I think&#8230; it is easier to get the smooth feeling I want. Similar Posts:Digital to Analog, and Back What makes a good lens? Review [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the bokeh of many manual lenses. I gave this Pentacon (previous Meyer) a try, and loved it too. These f1.7-f2 lenses are easier to use then the f1.4 I think&#8230; it is easier to get the smooth feeling I want.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3545/3335898929_af639cf01f_o.jpg"><img alt="Soft thorns" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3545/3335898929_19a0a58b79.jpg" title="Soft thorns" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Soft thorns</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3350/3335902551_a96f60f066_o.jpg"><img alt="Fungus wideopen" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3350/3335902551_680dda6696.jpg" title="Fungus wideopen" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fungus wideopen</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/digital-to-analog-and-back.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 18, 2008">Digital to Analog, and Back</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/cold-bokeh-with-yashica-ml-50mm14.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 8, 2009">Cold bokeh with Yashica ML 50mm/1.4</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 13.634 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/bokeh-from-pentacon-50mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newcomer &#8211; Praktica LTL with Pentacon 50mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/newcomer-praktica-ltl-with-pentacon-50mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/newcomer-praktica-ltl-with-pentacon-50mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 12:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[praktica]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got this from my wife, a Praktica LTL with the Pentacon 50mm/1.8 which she found in the fleemarket. Thanks, Sara :) Unfortunately the filtererings on the lens was bad, dented. I fixed it by smashing a greenfilter and attached to the lens. Not great for collectors probably, but I like to use this m42 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this from my wife, a Praktica LTL with the Pentacon 50mm/1.8 which she found in the fleemarket. Thanks, Sara :) </p>
<div id="attachment_623" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/praktica-ltl.jpg"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/praktica-ltl-340x258.jpg" alt="Praktica LTL with Pentacon 50mm/1.8" title="Praktica LTL with Pentacon 50mm/1.8" width="340" height="258" class="size-medium wp-image-623" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Praktica LTL with Pentacon 50mm/1.8</p></div>
<p>Unfortunately the filtererings on the lens was bad, dented. I fixed it by smashing a greenfilter and attached to the lens. Not great for collectors probably, but I like to use this m42 lens&#8230; with filters and hood :) </p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2009">Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/miracles-from-the-fleemarket-pentacon-tulip.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 23, 2009">Miracles from the fleemarket &#8211; Pentacon tulip</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/funny-retro-commercials-for-praktica.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 28, 2008">Funny retro commercials for Praktica</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 8.460 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/newcomer-praktica-ltl-with-pentacon-50mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hazards in the life of a naturephotographer</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-hazards-in-the-life-of-a-naturephotographer.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-hazards-in-the-life-of-a-naturephotographer.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Storys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold as hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amateur or professional alike &#8211; naturephotographers sometimes need to make choices like &#8220;it&#8217;s the image worth the risk&#8220;. Well, yesterday I had a really nice image in view&#8230; all I needed to do was to take an extra step out on the ice of the rapid/creek&#8230; Maybe this is what&#8217;s seperates the professional from the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amateur or professional alike &#8211; naturephotographers sometimes need to make choices like &#8220;<em>it&#8217;s the image worth the risk</em>&#8220;. Well, yesterday I had a really nice image in view&#8230; all I needed to do was to take an extra step out on the ice of the rapid/creek&#8230;</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3335903329_7f7b18bbec_o.jpg" rel="lightbox nofollow"><img alt="Cold water" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3335903329_fd69d2a575.jpg" title="Dam that river" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Cold water</p></div>
<p><span id="more-615"></span></p>
<p>Maybe this is what&#8217;s seperates the professional from the amateur &#8211; the pro realizes there will come more opportunites and makes the safe choice, the amateur thought is &#8220;<em>what the hell, let&#8217;s do it</em>&#8220;. Or is it a distinction between techphotograper (expensive camera) or retrophotographer (with manual cheap lenses, like myself) &#8211; I can risk the gear without financial ruin in sight. Whatever the reasons, I decided to take the chance when I stood there besides the creek. Mantra: &#8220;<em>The snow and ice will hold my weight. The snow and ice will hold my weight [...]</em>&#8221;</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3313/3335903233_8b5c2c29ae_o.jpg" rel="lightbox nofollow"><img alt="Icefester" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3313/3335903233_544ec4f029.jpg" title="Icefester" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Icefester</p></div>
<p>As you might have guessed by now the snow and ice did <strong>NOT</strong> hold my weight. The flowing, icecold water was filling my pants up to the waist. Panic. &#8220;<em>Quick, get up, take another step!</em>&#8220;. The snow and ice dont hold the weight of the next step either. Eventually I ofcourse get up on the side. Just to realize I&#8217;m on the wrong side of the creek and there&#8217;s no way out (impossible cliffs and forest). WTF. Nothing else to do, I need to get in the water again and wade over to the right side.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3405/3335903555_ab2f96283f_o.jpg" rel="lightbox nofollow"><img alt="Time to wade" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3405/3335903555_463e367070.jpg" title="Time to wade" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Time to wade</p></div>
<p><em>Just a note</em>: It is still wintertime where I live in Sweden. The ground is covered in snow. Paths and roads is covered with ice. I don&#8217;t have a drivers license. I have a bicycle. Which is ok in the wilderness, unless you are wet and it&#8217;s below freezing temperature. The road is downhill and covered with ice&#8230; where cars have made tracks. Bicyclewheels get stuck in tracks and throw you out in the ditch sometimes. Oh, and it&#8217;s getting dark. No battery in the headlight.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m going to stop there. Lets just say my saturday was eventfull, haha! ;) </p>
<p><strong>Learning from the trip:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Not to step on snow if your&#8217;e not sure whats beneath (on the other hand I already knew this ;) ).</li>
<li>Bring dry pants&#8230; and underwear&#8230; maybe even shoes.</li>
<li>Bring a polarizer when shooting a creek sourrounded by snow.</li>
<li>The Pentacon 50mm/1.8 is underestimated.</li>
<li>Spring will be nice&#8230; come dear spring, come.</li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/with-a-manual-lens-on-the-hill.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 12, 2010">With a manual lens on the hill</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/morningsun-on-forest.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 11, 2009">Morningsun on forest</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-setback.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 21, 2010">Spring setback</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/sometimes-we-are-just-stuck-on-repeat-anemone-hepatica.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Sometimes we are just stuck on repeat (Anemone hepatica)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/water-avens-in-may-digging-through-the-archive.html" rel="bookmark" title="June 23, 2009">Water avens in may (digging through the archive)</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.797 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/the-hazards-in-the-life-of-a-naturephotographer.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[135mm seems to have been a very common focal length of lenses. There are many to choose from. Because there was fierce competition, many of them are of good quality. Let see if this lens is one of the good ones&#8230; My purchase I bought the lens on Tradera (swedish ebay) for SEK 57 (about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>135mm seems to have been a very common focal length of lenses. There are many to choose from. Because there was fierce competition, many of them are of good quality. Let see if this lens is one of the good ones&#8230;</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><img title="Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3225/2744757581_82b611fdd7_o.jpg" alt="Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8" width="350" height="255" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8</p></div>
<p><strong>My purchase</strong><br />
I bought the lens on Tradera (swedish ebay) for SEK 57 (about £5) + shipping, without seeing much of it in the images of the ad. I was lucky, it is in good optical condition and only fault is that it is sometimes a little stuck at the aperture. Good ones is seen on ebay almost every day, so it&#8217;s a quite common lens.</p>
<p><span id="more-164"></span></p>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8 manufactured in a factory in Dresden, which was the former Carl Zeiss. A slim lens that are well built. It has a M42 screwmount that makes it easy to fit the EOS with an adapter. I guess you could find these on a Praktica-camera. The Electric version has zebra-type finish (like some Meyer and Zeiss also have). Early versions have close relation the Meyer equilant and more aperture-blades.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3218/2745593732_48539218fb_o.jpg"><img title="Pentacon Electric 135mm/f2.8 from the side" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3218/2745593732_1268ed8ce1_m.jpg" alt="Pentacon Electric 135mm/f2.8 from the side" width="240" height="154" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentacon Electric 135mm/f2.8 from the side</p></div>
<p>The resistance in the rings is ok in spite of a certain age. Sometimes apertureblades get stuck, but it is easily fixed through a little twist. The focus is very long to turn &#8211; this lens is not for fast focusing ;)</p>
<p>Thanks to the aperture ring sits closest to the camera, it is a bit difficult to see the scale because of the Canon EOS built-in flash, which shoots out over the aperture ring. There are of course only a compatibility problem, the lens and the camera was not made to fit together.</p>
<p><strong>Testing<br />
</strong>I&#8217;ve used this a lot from march to beginning of June 2008. It is supposed to be a great lens for portraits, but I&#8217;ve also used with success on landscapes. The best landscapes I&#8217;ve taken with this lens was in gray/blue days.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3068/2744757473_828c59139a_o.jpg"><img title="Pentacon 135-lens with case" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3068/2744757473_7604b8337e_m.jpg" alt="Pentacon 135-lens with case" width="240" height="193" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentacon 135-lens with case</p></div>
<p>It is a sharp lens with good colour reproduction. According to information on the Internet, it has very good bokeh, I even saw the words &#8220;monster of bokeh&#8221; being used. It does have really good bokeh, but earlier versions of this lens is supposed to be even better.</p>
<p>135mm on my digital EOS-sensor with crop the focal length is 216mm, that is closer to tele (but not enough for tele, closeup birdphoto and the like, in my humble opinion&#8230; on the other hand I shot swallows with 50mm lens the other day).</p>
<p>I like this lens, but I like the Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm better, with it&#8217;s fast focus and clear image. The Pentacons built in hood seems a bit fragile.</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3051/2745593832_75a2b7b8ee_o.jpg"><img title="Lake with fog" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3051/2745593832_c23930cc25_m.jpg" alt="Lake with fog" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Lake with fog</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3226/2744757767_a232db7338_o.jpg"><img title="Swan" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3226/2744757767_c747a810ab_m.jpg" alt="Swan" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Swan</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/2745593954_26505ac191_o.jpg"><img title="Sculpture of boy" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/2745593954_428b05e45b_m.jpg" alt="Sculpture of boy" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sculpture of boy</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3065/2745593888_76bcac8145_o.jpg"><img title="Clouds over Garphyttan" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3065/2745593888_5b8db68670_m.jpg" alt="Clouds over Garphyttan" width="240" height="186" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Clouds over Garphyttan</p></div>
<p><strong>Pros and cons</strong><br />
<span style="color: #008000;">+ Sharp<br />
+ Good colors<br />
+ Good bokeh<br />
+ Built-in lens hood (good against backlight of course)</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">- Long focus<br />
- Sticky aperture on my copy (though I can live with that)<br />
- As in many lenses EOS-flash sticks out over the aperture ring scale, making it difficult to adjust.<br />
- Built-in lens hood (fragile feeling and awkward with filters)</span></p>
<p><strong>Further reading</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://forum.manualfocus.org/viewtopic.php?pid=79122" target="_blank">Discussion at manualfocus.org</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.mflenses.com/pentacon-135mm-f-2.8-32.html" target="_blank">Review at mflenses.com</a></li>
<li><a href="”http://oomz.net/135/”" target="”_blank”">135mm lens war</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.fotosidan.se/reviews/viewreviews.htm?ID=2977" target="_blank">Review at Fotosidan.se (swedish)<br />
</a></li>
<li><a href="”http://www.wholesaledigital.co.za/pntcn135f2.8.htm”" target="”_blank”">Digital World Review</a></li>
<li><a href="”http://www.flickr.com/photos/sikario/sets/72157600126540615/”" target="”_blank”">A flickr-set</a></li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-mc-helios-44-3-58mmf2.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 4, 2008">Review of MC Helios 44-3 58mm/f2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-carl-zeiss-jena-sonnar-135mm35-zebra.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2008">Review of Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm/3.5 Zebra</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 8.428 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

