<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; pentax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/pentax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>World Pentax day</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/world-pentax-day.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/world-pentax-day.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 07:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[August 15 is world Pentax day, where Pentax users around the world photographs on the same day. The result is shown of at Pentaxforums.com, if you want to participate. Similar Posts:Russian M42-lens Mir-1V photographing in the sundown I discovered a new world 2008 Become Yashica-user number 30 to join the forum! A busy weekend with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>August 15 is <strong>world Pentax day</strong>, where Pentax users around the world photographs on the same day. The result is shown of at <a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Pentaxforums.com</a>, if you want to participate.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3916238979/" title="Sup-Tak 85/1.9 on Spotmatic again by Mattias Wirf (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3490/3916238979_1082dbae5d_m.jpg" width="240" height="164" alt="Sup-Tak 85/1.9 on Spotmatic again" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/russian-m42-lens-mir-1v-photographing-in-the-sundown.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Russian M42-lens Mir-1V photographing in the sundown</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/i-discovered-a-new-world-2008.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 5, 2009">I discovered a new world 2008</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/become-yashicauser-number-30-to-join-the-forum.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 6, 2008">Become Yashica-user number 30 to join the forum!</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-busy-weekend-with-hiking-yashica-and-pentax.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 22, 2008">A busy weekend with hiking, Yashica and Pentax</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/introducing-yashicaforumcom.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 10, 2008">Introducing YashicaForum.com</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.915 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/world-pentax-day.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asahi Takumar frenzy</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-takumar-frenzy.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-takumar-frenzy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto-Takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-m-c takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the Takumar M42-lenses I owned/own. Works great on my Canon EOS, of course :) And they are also very pretty. Similar Posts:Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens A window to 1946 Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 on Pentax Spotmatic &#8211; beautiful old camera Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8 Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the Takumar M42-lenses I owned/own. Works great on my Canon EOS, of course :) And they are also very pretty.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3655065267/" title="Asahi Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3308/3655065267_20a6d9ab6e.jpg" width="500" height="349" alt="Asahi Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3655863364/" title="Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm/3.5 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3398/3655863364_c847808b8f.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Asahi Super-Takumar 35mm/3.5" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3655055767/" title="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3655055767_1d14c08fbc.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3655863610/" title="Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3614/3655863610_64274c4554.jpg" width="500" height="349" alt="Asahi Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" /></a></div>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3655863260/" title="Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3612/3655863260_6868a4c1bd.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-window-to-1946.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2010">A window to 1946</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-on-pentax-spotmatic-beautiful-old-camera.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 9, 2008">Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 on Pentax Spotmatic &#8211; beautiful old camera</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.046 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-takumar-frenzy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Aquilegia vulgaris</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-aquilegia-vulgaris.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-aquilegia-vulgaris.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These beautiful flowers Aquilegia vulgaris grow in a place near my home (yes, I live in a nice place). They come in different shades of blue to white. In swedish they are called Akleja, according to Wikipedia en english name is European Columbine. The image is made with my lens Asahi Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5, an M42 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These beautiful flowers <em>Aquilegia vulgaris</em> grow in a place near my home (yes, I live in a nice place). They come in different shades of blue to white. In swedish they are called <em>Akleja</em>, according to Wikipedia en english name is <em>European Columbine</em>. The image is made with my lens Asahi Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5, an M42 lens attached to my Canon EOS 350D. I also used an M42 extensionring from Chinon. I kind of like the result.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3371/3647830386_5bf1673bec_o.jpg"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3371/3647830386_f24abc8933.jpg" width="500" height="333" alt="Akleja" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/thunder-awaits-us.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 13, 2009">Thunder awaits us</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/garphyttan-in-morning-mist.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 8, 2008">Garphyttan in morning mist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/growing-up.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 13, 2009">Growing up</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 18, 2011">Preset Asahi-lens and flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/becoming-a-blueberry.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 31, 2010">Becoming a blueberry</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.603 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/another-aquilegia-vulgaris.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My photography wishlist</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/my-photography-wishlist.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/my-photography-wishlist.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[k20d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tele prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tlr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wishes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian on Epic Edit has made a post about his photography wishlist and challenged the readers to make their own. So here is mine as a post instead of a comment ;) S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 or other long tele prime I had one but sold it. Would really like to shoot images of birds and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian on Epic Edit has made a post about <a href="http://blog.epicedits.com/2009/04/17/whats-on-your-photography-wish-list/" target="_blank">his photography wishlist</a> and challenged the readers to make their own. So here is mine as a post instead of a comment ;) </p>
<ol>
<li><strong>S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 or other long tele prime</strong><br />
I had one but sold it. Would really like to shoot images of birds and wildlife. Actually I would be ok with a modern one here. But I would need&#8230;</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2915717151/" title="Pentax Spotmatic with S-M-C- Takumar 300mm/4 by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/2915717151_2107a24d87_m.jpg" width="240" height="213" alt="Pentax Spotmatic with S-M-C- Takumar 300mm/4" /></a></div>
</li>
<li><strong>A new tripod</strong><br />
Hade on but had to sell it :/ Arggh.</li>
<li><strong>A Takumar-version of 85mm/1.8</strong><br />
Had one but had to sell it. I love the Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8<br />
<a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_3316.jpg"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/img_3316-340x241.jpg" alt="Auto Takumar 85" title="Auto Takumar 85" width="340" height="241" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-432" /></a></li>
<li><strong>A good Yashica Electro 35 GSN</strong><br />
I like the Electro, but the one I own is smashed (by previous owner).
</li>
<li><strong>Pentax K20D or Canon EOS 50D</strong><br />
My EOS 350D is ok&#8230; I can live with it. But gosh now it would feel nice to upgrade. I like Pentax but I need to keep using my Contax/Yashica-lenses so I guess Canon is the way to go.</li>
<li><strong>A 120mm-format TLR or SLR</strong><br />
I have a Agfa Isolette V, but I would really like a Yashica-Mat or Mamiya or something larger and a with a focus of some kind.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2364187889/" title="Agfa Isolette V by Mattias (Retrocamera.net), on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2314/2364187889_b668345aa6_m.jpg" width="240" height="160" alt="Agfa Isolette V" /></div>
<p></a>
</li>
</ol>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/batteries-for-your-yashica-electro.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 11, 2008">Batteries for your Yashica Electro</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/upcoming-lensreview.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2009">Upcoming lensreview</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.766 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/my-photography-wishlist.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pidgins with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/pidgins-with-super-takumar-135mm35.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/pidgins-with-super-takumar-135mm35.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black and white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kilsbergen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a trip to Granbergsdal with friends I made the images of pidgins with the Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5. The black and white was converted in Photoshop and the little grain came from a layer with scanned T-Max 400 imported in photoshop and put on this digital image. Similar Posts:Greenfilter + Photoshop = Graphical Portraits with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a trip to Granbergsdal with friends I made the images of pidgins with the Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5. The black and white was converted in Photoshop and the little grain came from a layer with scanned T-Max 400 imported in photoshop and put on this digital image.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3482/3274069049_b30d0cc3be_o.jpg"><img alt="Pidgins on rooftop" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3482/3274069049_c0ca244e80.jpg" title="Pidgins on rooftop" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pidgins on rooftop</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/greenfilter-photoshop-graphical.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 28, 2009">Greenfilter + Photoshop = Graphical</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portraits-with-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2008">Portraits with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-wife-on-colourfilm-scanned-and-converted-to-black-and-white-daydreaming.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 7, 2009">My wife on colourfilm, scanned and converted to black and white. Daydreaming?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/old-brochure-from-luzern-in-the-60s.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 29, 2009">Old brochure from Luzern in the 60&#8242;s</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.893 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/pidgins-with-super-takumar-135mm35.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax Spotmatic with S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-spotmatic-with-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-spotmatic-with-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bragging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-m-c takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the nicest lenses in my Asahi collection. It&#8217;s a common lens, but veeeeery nice. Buy one! ;) If you want more about Takumar lenses it&#8217;s a good idea to register on www.takumar.org or www.pentaxforums.com. Similar Posts:Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8 Swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic Photolinks, part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the nicest lenses in my Asahi collection. It&#8217;s a common lens, but veeeeery nice. Buy one! ;)<br />
If you want more about Takumar lenses it&#8217;s a good idea to register on <a href="http://www.takumar.org" target="_blank">www.takumar.org</a> or <a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com" target="_blank">www.pentaxforums.com</a>.</p>
<div id="attachment_333" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/img_3334.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/img_3334-340x227.jpg" alt="Spotmatic and S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8" title="Spotmatic and S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8" width="340" height="227" class="size-medium wp-image-333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Spotmatic and S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/swedish-nature-shot-with-old-asahi-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2009">Swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/auto-takumar-85mm18-on-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 4, 2008">Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8 on Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/photolinks-part-1.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 6, 2009">Photolinks, part 1</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.120 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-spotmatic-with-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pentax Super-Takumar 105mm/2.8, bokeh and David Bowie&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-super-takumar-105mm28-bokeh-and-david-bowie.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-super-takumar-105mm28-bokeh-and-david-bowie.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[105mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bokeh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting bokeh of my Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 105mm/2.8 M42 on Canon EOS 350D: I was listening on David Bowie singing &#8220;My Death&#8221; while editing this image, I thought the feeling was appropiate to this leaf that&#8217;s near death ;) [flash http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rIzE3j84kKU w=425 h=344] Similar Posts:Renewed Flickr account today What makes a good picture? Asahi Super-Takumar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting bokeh of my Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 105mm/2.8 M42 on Canon EOS 350D:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2943675223_40f19ed650_o.jpg"><img title="Autumn leaf hanging on..." src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/2943675223_eb45e40cfd.jpg" alt="Autumn leaf hanging on..." width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Autumn leaf hanging on...</p></div>
<p>I was listening on David Bowie singing &#8220;My Death&#8221; while editing this image, I thought the feeling was appropiate to this leaf that&#8217;s near death ;)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[flash http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rIzE3j84kKU w=425 h=344]</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/renewed-flickr-account-today.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 1, 2010">Renewed Flickr account today</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-picture.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 1, 2009">What makes a good picture?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-on-pentax-spotmatic-beautiful-old-camera.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 9, 2008">Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 on Pentax Spotmatic &#8211; beautiful old camera</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/whooper-swans-with-super-takumar-135mm.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 5, 2010">Whooper swans with Super-Takumar 135mm</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 3.793 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/pentax-super-takumar-105mm28-bokeh-and-david-bowie.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new Asahi arrival</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-new-asahi-arrival.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-new-asahi-arrival.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 21:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bragging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-m-c takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just want to show off my new S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 :) This is not the best image, but I think it shows the size of the lens. Eventhough the hood is not extracted. I photographed the whole Pentax-collection tonight so more (and better) pictures will be published. Similar Posts:The early Tokina that came with my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just want to show off my new S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 :) This is not the best image, but I think it shows the size of the lens. Eventhough the hood is not extracted. I photographed the whole Pentax-collection tonight so more (and better) pictures will be published.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/2915717151_ab2ee79290_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 on my Pentax Spotmatic." src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/2915717151_2107a24d87.jpg" title="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 on my Pentax Spotmatic." width="500" height="444" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4 on my Pentax Spotmatic.</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/the-early-tokina-that-came-with-my-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2008">The early Tokina that came with my Spotmatic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/garphyttan-in-morning-mist.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 8, 2008">Garphyttan in morning mist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/point-your-lens-at-the-sun.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 2, 2010">Point your lens at the sun</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.382 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-new-asahi-arrival.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First test with Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 m42</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bragging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supertakumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I recieved the Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 I won on ebay (fast shipping!). I took it out for a first try.. here are some images. Observe, the bumblebee is a 100% crop! Review will come eventually. Similar Posts:Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens Bohemian waxwings with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 Portrait of Sara with Asahi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I recieved the Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 <a title="My win" href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=190246465892" target="_blank">I won on ebay</a> (fast shipping!). I took it out for a first try.. here are some images. Observe, the bumblebee is a 100% crop! Review will come eventually.</p>
<div id="attachment_233" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 237px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0262.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-233" title="Sunflower" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0262-227x340.jpg" alt="Suflower" width="227" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suflower</p></div>
<div id="attachment_234" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 265px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0276.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-234" title="100% crop bumblebee" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0276-255x340.jpg" alt="100% crop bumblebee" width="255" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">100% crop bumblebee</p></div>
<div id="attachment_236" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 236px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0428.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-236" title="Mushrooms" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0428-226x340.jpg" alt="Mushrooms" width="226" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mushrooms</p></div>
<div id="attachment_235" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 236px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0336.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-235" title="Broken tree" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0336-226x340.jpg" alt="Broken tree" width="226" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Broken tree</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/bohemian-waxwings-with-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2008">Bohemian waxwings with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 10.953 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supertakumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of talk of Takumars and old Pentax-lenses. Old ones can go for quite a lot of money sometimes. So what&#8217;s so special about them? I got a 35mm (maybe not the most famous of the Pentax-lenses, but still&#8230;), lets find out how they work. The purchase I purchased this lens from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of talk of Takumars and old Pentax-lenses. Old ones can go for quite a lot of money sometimes. So what&#8217;s so special about them? I got a 35mm (maybe not the most famous of the Pentax-lenses, but still&#8230;), lets find out how they work.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_0c14172577_o.jpg"><img title="Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_13deb684ab_m.jpg" alt="Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, an m42 lens." width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, an m42 lens.</p></div>
<p><strong>The purchase</strong><br />
I purchased this lens from a friend on the net for 200 swedish kronor (about 20€). He keeps nagging about these Super Takumars, so I wanted to see what all the fuzz was about ;) He said the lens was worn, but it was just some external colour disappeared, everything else feels very good. Most of the time, the Pentax lenses go for some money both in Sweden and on ebay.</p>
<p><span id="more-207"></span></p>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, has a M42-mount so for my Canon EOS 350D I&#8217;ve used an adapter. The build quality is extremely nice, and feel in the focusring is charming. The aperturering clicks in to it&#8217;s values, which is a good thing because with this one I think it&#8217;s really important to use stop-down metering.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong><br />
The bokeh is good, one details is that the flares are not round. But otherwise soft, pleasant bokeh. The colours feel very saturated and nice, rich. I had a hood on the lens when I took the images below, not a Pentax hood but a rubber hood in the filtermount. I think you can get sharp images, but some pictures I&#8217;ve taken feels soft in a positive way. I should mention that I don&#8217;t often work to get sharp images, it&#8217;s not often a very important criteria for me (as you might have noticed a lot of my images play with fog, light and such).</p>
<p>I really like some of the images I&#8217;ve taken with this lens since I got it, offcourse it&#8217;s not all down to the lens but it means something when you got a lens you feel comfortable with. It&#8217;s actually my first 35mm prime along with the Yashica ML 35mm f2.8 (which I&#8217;m also testing at the moment).</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_886cc4481c_o.jpg"><img title="Solros" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_8d9df6be07_m.jpg" alt="Solros" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Solros</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2729031705_754e43f711_o.jpg"><img title="Dimma" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2729031705_eb55b780d1_m.jpg" alt="Dimma" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bakom station</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 203px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2729031953_a011d34073_o.jpg"><img title="Parkerad dimma" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2729031953_fe2d33a25d_m.jpg" alt="Parkerad dimma" width="193" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Parkerad dimma</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2777808287_54e9d5a674_o.jpg"><img title="Svartvit utsikt" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2777808287_6ca04bc33a_m.jpg" alt="Svartvit utsikt" width="240" height="159" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Svartvit utsikt</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2770114177_e5f92a8f75_o.jpg"><img title="Stol i barack" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2770114177_0a738a5582_m.jpg" alt="Stol i barack" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Stol i barack</p></div>
<p><strong>Pros</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Great build quality</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Can be sharp, can be soft (control with f-stop)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Ok bokeh</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Nice, saturated colours</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Feels really nice to use, fantastic feeling in the focusring :)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons<br id="l2l00" /> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Not round flares (not round aperture), if you like that sort of thing</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Can be a bit hard to find the right focus</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Reading</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/showproduct.php?product=259&amp;cat=20" target="_blank">Opinions from the Pentax Forums users</a>.<br />
There&#8217;s a lot of links if you search Google. If you have ideas please suggest them in the comments to this post :)</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.781 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

