<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; sonnar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/sonnar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm/3.5 Zebra</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-carl-zeiss-jena-sonnar-135mm35-zebra.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-carl-zeiss-jena-sonnar-135mm35-zebra.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lensreview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonnar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zeiss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=59</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Zeiss-lens, extension-rings and shipping for about 25$? No it&#8217;s not a fairytale, I actually got this bargain from swedish ebay Tradera. It all started when I saw an ad with unknown lens marked &#8220;aus Jena&#8221;&#8230; My purchase I could not believe my luck. Was I the only one connecting the mark &#8220;aus Jena&#8221; to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Zeiss-lens, extension-rings and shipping for about 25$? No it&#8217;s not a fairytale, I actually got this bargain from swedish ebay Tradera. It all started when I saw an ad with <em>unknown lens</em> marked &#8220;aus Jena&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_60" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_front.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-60" title="czj_135_front" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_front-180x180.jpg" alt="Carl Zeiss Jena S 135mm/3.5" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Carl Zeiss Jena S 135mm/3.5</p></div>
<p><strong>My purchase</strong><br />
I could not believe my luck. Was I the only one connecting the mark &#8220;aus Jena&#8221; to Carl Zeiss? Actually, someone else competed with me about the final bid, but I still got this 135mm lens for only 140 swedish kronor (about 20$). When it arrived in the mail, I put it to good use immediately!</p>
<p><span id="more-59"></span></p>
<p><strong>Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135mm/3.5 Zebra, the lens</strong><br />
The mount on this lens is M42 screwmount (could be version with other mounts too). That means you need a adapter to make your modern DSLR take M42-lenses. These adapters are often sold cheap on ebay and well-stocked camerashops.</p>
<div id="attachment_61" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_side.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-61" title="czj_135_side" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_side-340x226.jpg" alt="CZJ Sonnar 135mm/3.5 from the side" width="340" height="226" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">CZJ Sonnar 135mm/3.5 from the side</p></div>
<p>The focal length when this lens is mounted on my Canon EOS 350D is 215mm. The image is incredible clear and sharp, which makes it easy to focus. Manual focusing is fast and easy, specially compared to my Pentacon Electric 135mm/2.8 where you have to turn, turn, turn the focusring for ages (that slow focus can also come in handy some times though).</p>
<div id="attachment_72" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/rings.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-72" title="Makrorings" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/rings-180x180.jpg" alt="The extensionrings included in the purchase" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The extensionrings included in the purchase</p></div> </p>
<p>This version of the lens is called &#8220;zebra&#8221; because of it&#8217;s striped rings. It is a singlecoated lens that was manufactured 1967-70 according to serial number (see links at the end of article for sources). The purpose of coating is to reduce reflections from lenses surface. Old lenses are often singlecoated, in the 70&#8242;s multicoating came in use. However, there is nothing that says a singlecoated in different situations can be better then a multicoated one. So don&#8217;t make the assumption multicoat-lenses are better (even if that often is true).</p>
<p><div id="attachment_63" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_back.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-63" title="czj_135_back" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_back-180x180.jpg" alt="asu Jena S 135mm/3,5 m42 from the back" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">asu Jena S 135mm/3,5 m42 from the back</p></div>
<p>The lens has an aperturepin that&#8217;s probably for some autofunction. It comes with a external button to use in conjunction with the pin. You need to press the pin or button to make the aperture close (otherwise it&#8217;s wideopen all the time). If your adapter or camera doesn&#8217;t press on the pin, it takes som training to manually press the external button, while your focusing and pressing the exposurebutton on the camera. When you get the hang of it, it&#8217;s actually a good function that makes focusing easier.</p>
<div id="attachment_62" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 210px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_aperture_pin.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-62" title="czj_135_aperture_pin" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_135_aperture_pin.jpg" alt="Aperture pin and button" width="200" height="214" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Aperture pin and button</p></div>
<p><strong>Images<br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">As  you might have noticed from my previous reviews, I don&#8217;t do the kind of test where you make aperture diagrams and big images, 100% crops etc. I simply use the lens a while, in real life. I see no reason to test lenses in another way then I would use it in real work &#8211; thats where they have to prove themselfs. Images has been processed from RAW, scaled and sharpened.</span></strong></p>
<p>These images was shot on different occasions form midsummer to present date (july 2008). The motifs are nature around swedish city of Örebro, some cityshots and a portrait of my sister-in-law when visiting the train station.</p>
<div id="attachment_68" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_hedvig.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-68" title="czj_hedvig" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_hedvig-180x180.jpg" alt="Portrait of my sister in law" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Portrait of my sister in law</p></div>
<div id="attachment_65" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_butterflies.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-65" title="czj_butterflies" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_butterflies-180x180.jpg" alt="Butterflies" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Butterflies</p></div>
<div id="attachment_66" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_clothes.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-66" title="czj_clothes" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_clothes-180x180.jpg" alt="Public art with clothes" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Public art with clothes</p></div>
<p><div id="attachment_64" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 190px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_boat.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-64" title="czj_boat" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/czj_boat-180x180.jpg" alt="Morning at the river with boat" width="180" height="180" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Morning at the river with boat</p></div> </p>
<p><strong>My opinion on this lens</strong><br />
You might already have guessed &#8211; <em>I really like this lens</em>! It has become my favorite since I bought it. Colours, sharpness, feel &#8211; all good.</p>
<p><strong>Pros</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #008000;">Sharp</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;">Good colours</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;">Nice bokeh</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;">Fast and easy manual focusing with clear image.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;">Just feels like magic.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">The aperturepin/button, but the more I use it the more I think its a usable feature.</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Single coating. It ain&#8217;t that bad actually, this lens has been said to outgun the multicoated version.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>History</strong><br />
The company Zeiss is alive today, in two parts created after the war. If you want to know more about them you can read up on their homepage or on the WikiPedia article. Lenses from Carl Zeiss are pretty much always of good quality.</p>
<p><strong>Links</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=6865&#038;postdays=0&#038;postorder=asc&#038;start=0&#038;sid=0c866fc1db3efbd87704ac368622f355" target="_blank">Year by Serial</a></li>
</ul>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/manual-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 18, 2008">5 reasons I love manual lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-auto-yashinon-dx-50mm17-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 17, 2008">Review of Auto Yashinon-DX 50mm/1.7 m42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-29mm-28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 26, 2008">Review of Pentacon Auto 29mm / 2.8 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.230 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-carl-zeiss-jena-sonnar-135mm35-zebra.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

