<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; supertakumar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/supertakumar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 10:13:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First test with Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 m42</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bragging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supertakumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I recieved the Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 I won on ebay (fast shipping!). I took it out for a first try.. here are some images. Observe, the bumblebee is a 100% crop! Review will come eventually. Similar Posts:Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens Bohemian waxwings with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 Portrait of Sara with Asahi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I recieved the Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 <a title="My win" href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&amp;item=190246465892" target="_blank">I won on ebay</a> (fast shipping!). I took it out for a first try.. here are some images. Observe, the bumblebee is a 100% crop! Review will come eventually.</p>
<div id="attachment_233" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 237px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0262.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-233" title="Sunflower" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0262-227x340.jpg" alt="Suflower" width="227" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Suflower</p></div>
<div id="attachment_234" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 265px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0276.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-234" title="100% crop bumblebee" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0276-255x340.jpg" alt="100% crop bumblebee" width="255" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">100% crop bumblebee</p></div>
<div id="attachment_236" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 236px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0428.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-236" title="Mushrooms" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0428-226x340.jpg" alt="Mushrooms" width="226" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Mushrooms</p></div>
<div id="attachment_235" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 236px"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0336.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img class="size-medium wp-image-235" title="Broken tree" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/w_img_0336-226x340.jpg" alt="Broken tree" width="226" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Broken tree</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/bohemian-waxwings-with-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2008">Bohemian waxwings with Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/portrait-of-sara-with-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 19, 2008">Portrait of Sara with Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.384 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supertakumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of talk of Takumars and old Pentax-lenses. Old ones can go for quite a lot of money sometimes. So what&#8217;s so special about them? I got a 35mm (maybe not the most famous of the Pentax-lenses, but still&#8230;), lets find out how they work. The purchase I purchased this lens from a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of talk of Takumars and old Pentax-lenses. Old ones can go for quite a lot of money sometimes. So what&#8217;s so special about them? I got a 35mm (maybe not the most famous of the Pentax-lenses, but still&#8230;), lets find out how they work.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_0c14172577_o.jpg"><img title="Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_13deb684ab_m.jpg" alt="Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, an m42 lens." width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, an m42 lens.</p></div>
<p><strong>The purchase</strong><br />
I purchased this lens from a friend on the net for 200 swedish kronor (about 20€). He keeps nagging about these Super Takumars, so I wanted to see what all the fuzz was about ;) He said the lens was worn, but it was just some external colour disappeared, everything else feels very good. Most of the time, the Pentax lenses go for some money both in Sweden and on ebay.</p>
<p><span id="more-207"></span></p>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5, has a M42-mount so for my Canon EOS 350D I&#8217;ve used an adapter. The build quality is extremely nice, and feel in the focusring is charming. The aperturering clicks in to it&#8217;s values, which is a good thing because with this one I think it&#8217;s really important to use stop-down metering.</p>
<p><strong>Results</strong><br />
The bokeh is good, one details is that the flares are not round. But otherwise soft, pleasant bokeh. The colours feel very saturated and nice, rich. I had a hood on the lens when I took the images below, not a Pentax hood but a rubber hood in the filtermount. I think you can get sharp images, but some pictures I&#8217;ve taken feels soft in a positive way. I should mention that I don&#8217;t often work to get sharp images, it&#8217;s not often a very important criteria for me (as you might have noticed a lot of my images play with fog, light and such).</p>
<p>I really like some of the images I&#8217;ve taken with this lens since I got it, offcourse it&#8217;s not all down to the lens but it means something when you got a lens you feel comfortable with. It&#8217;s actually my first 35mm prime along with the Yashica ML 35mm f2.8 (which I&#8217;m also testing at the moment).</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_886cc4481c_o.jpg"><img title="Solros" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_8d9df6be07_m.jpg" alt="Solros" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Solros</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2729031705_754e43f711_o.jpg"><img title="Dimma" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2729031705_eb55b780d1_m.jpg" alt="Dimma" width="240" height="160" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bakom station</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 203px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2729031953_a011d34073_o.jpg"><img title="Parkerad dimma" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3013/2729031953_fe2d33a25d_m.jpg" alt="Parkerad dimma" width="193" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Parkerad dimma</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2777808287_54e9d5a674_o.jpg"><img title="Svartvit utsikt" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3233/2777808287_6ca04bc33a_m.jpg" alt="Svartvit utsikt" width="240" height="159" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Svartvit utsikt</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 170px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2770114177_e5f92a8f75_o.jpg"><img title="Stol i barack" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2770114177_0a738a5582_m.jpg" alt="Stol i barack" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Stol i barack</p></div>
<p><strong>Pros</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Great build quality</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Can be sharp, can be soft (control with f-stop)<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Ok bokeh</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Nice, saturated colours</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #008000;"> Feels really nice to use, fantastic feeling in the focusring :)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons<br id="l2l00" /> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Not round flares (not round aperture), if you like that sort of thing</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Can be a bit hard to find the right focus</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Reading</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/showproduct.php?product=259&amp;cat=20" target="_blank">Opinions from the Pentax Forums users</a>.<br />
There&#8217;s a lot of links if you search Google. If you have ideas please suggest them in the comments to this post :)</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/what-makes-a-good-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="January 13, 2009">What makes a good lens?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.110 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

