<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>RetroCamera &#187; takumar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/tag/takumar/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Preset Asahi-lens and flowers</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anemone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=1021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flowers is a nice way to test new lenses, in my opinion. At the moment wood anemone (anemone nemorosa) is everywhere where I live. So I have tested the preset, early lens Asahi Takumar 105mm/2.8 on wood anemone, with an extensionring. Oh, and this also illustrates the hazards with photographing flowers &#8211; I put my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flowers is a nice way to test new lenses, in my opinion. At the moment wood anemone (<em>anemone nemorosa</em>) is everywhere where I live. So I have tested the preset, early lens Asahi Takumar 105mm/2.8 on wood anemone, with an extensionring. Oh, and this also illustrates the hazards with photographing flowers &#8211; I put my chin on very nasty ants (<em>myrmicinae</em>) who bites ;)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/wood-anemone1.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/wood-anemone1-226x340.jpg" alt="" title="wood-anemone" width="226" height="340" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1023" /></a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2011">Early spring flower with preset Takumar lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/anemone-nemorosa-with-the-solid-pentacon-501-8.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 20, 2011">Anemone nemorosa with the solid Pentacon 50/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/even-closer-with-the-super-takumar-28mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">Even closer with the Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/another-aquilegia-vulgaris.html" rel="bookmark" title="June 21, 2009">Another Aquilegia vulgaris</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-little-package.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 24, 2011">A little package</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.170 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early spring flower with preset Takumar lens</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Inspiration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, finally spring is coming here in my part of Sweden. These flowers (Hepatica nobilis, kdineywort, &#8220;blåsippa&#8221; in swedish) are fighting their way up. This is the first image I like from the early, preset Asahi Takumar 135mm/3.5 I showed my earlier post. Havent had a chance to test it very much yet, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, finally spring is coming here in my part of Sweden. These flowers (Hepatica nobilis, kdineywort, &#8220;blåsippa&#8221; in swedish) are fighting their way up. This is the first image I like from the early, preset Asahi Takumar 135mm/3.5 I showed my earlier post. Havent had a chance to test it very much yet, but it looks promising.</p>
<div align="center"><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/hepatica-nobilis-preset-takumar.jpg" rel="lightbox" title="Hepatica nobillis"><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/hepatica-nobilis-preset-takumar-249x340.jpg" alt="pennywort" title="hepatica-nobilis-preset-takumar" width="249" height="340" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1017" /></a></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 18, 2011">Preset Asahi-lens and flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/hepatica-nobilis-with-super-takumar-28mm35-and-macroring.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 16, 2009">Hepatica nobilis with Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 and macroring</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-preset-takumar-135mm3-5-m42-model-1957.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 8, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Preset Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42 (model 1957)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/spring-with-pentacon.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2010">Spring with Pentacon</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-little-package.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 24, 2011">A little package</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.264 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A little package</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-little-package.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-little-package.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Springtime. Inspiration sets in. And for a little extra boost of inspiration &#8211; some &#8220;new&#8221; (or very old ;) ) lenses. I bought two lenses from Daniel, the old preset Asahi Takumar 135mm/3.5 in mint condition and a preset Asahi Takumar 105mm/2.8. He even sent a long an extra Pentax-camera. At the moment I can&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Springtime. Inspiration sets in. And for a little extra boost of inspiration &#8211; some &#8220;new&#8221; (or very old ;) ) lenses. I bought two lenses from Daniel, the old preset Asahi Takumar 135mm/3.5 in mint condition and a preset Asahi Takumar 105mm/2.8. He even sent a long an extra Pentax-camera.</p>
<p>At the moment I can&#8217;t test the lenses very much since I have a work deadline today and a bad caugh that wants me to stay inside :( But I wanted to show you the beauty 135mm:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/preset-takumar-135mm-3-5.jpg" alt="" title="preset-takumar-135mm-3-5" width="500" height="327" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1010" /></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-camera-and-lens-testing-collection-on-flickr.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 25, 2008">My Camera and Lens-testing Collection on Flickr</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-preset-takumar-135mm3-5-m42-model-1957.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 8, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Preset Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42 (model 1957)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/preset-asahi-lens-and-flowers.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 18, 2011">Preset Asahi-lens and flowers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/early-spring-flower-with-preset-takumar-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2011">Early spring flower with preset Takumar lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/drawings-and-paintings.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 11, 2010">Drawings and paintings</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.471 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/a-little-package.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/swedish-nature-shot-with-old-asahi-lenses.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/swedish-nature-shot-with-old-asahi-lenses.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autumn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For me this is a typical piece of swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses (Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 and S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8), and an extension-ring. Lingonberries, heather and mushroom. Late summer/early autumn. The Takumar lenses are so nice for closeups, good sharpness and good bokeh. Slim and light, which is really good when you crawl in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me this is a typical piece of swedish nature shot with old Asahi-lenses (Super-Takumar 28mm/3.5 and <a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/2009/02/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18/">S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a>), and an extension-ring. Lingonberries, heather and mushroom. Late summer/early autumn. The Takumar lenses are so nice for closeups, good sharpness and good bokeh. Slim and light, which is really good when you crawl in the woods ;)</p>
<p>And you need to crawl to get good closups. It&#8217;s most often not fun looking at pictures taken with the ground as background.</p>
<p>If you click on the images, you go to the Flickr-page &#8211; just click the browsers backbutton to get back here.</p>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3829016799/" title="Standing guard by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2580/3829016799_bc6b9a2eaf_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Standing guard" /></a>
</div>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3829815402/" title="Heather by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2430/3829815402_8a645519a8_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Heather" /></a>
</div>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3829016627/" title="Lingonberry and heather by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2461/3829016627_8e558a5fda_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Lingonberry and heather" /></a>
</div>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3829815250/" title="Lingonberry by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2466/3829815250_7706b1df8e_m.jpg" width="160" height="240" alt="Lingonberry" /></a>
</div>
<div align="center">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/3829815058/" title="Lingonberry by Mattias Wirf, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2520/3829815058_527ed07b36_m.jpg" width="240" height="240" alt="Lingonberry" /></a>
</div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-preset-takumar-135mm3-5-m42-model-1957.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 8, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Preset Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42 (model 1957)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-mc-zoom-35-70mm3-5-4-5.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2009">Review of Yashica MC Zoom 35-70mm/3.5-4.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/back-after-an-accident.html" rel="bookmark" title="July 1, 2010">Back after an accident</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/more-and-more-of-this-blue-little-things.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 17, 2009">More and more of this blue little things</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/first-days-with-super-takumar-85mm1-9.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2009">First days with Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.102 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/swedish-nature-shot-with-old-asahi-lenses.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lensreviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42-lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend Daniel insisted I should have one of these, so I went and bought one from UK on ebay. Can you have enough of normal or short tele primes? ;) I started collecting Takumar lenses, so of course I needed the 135mm. Lets see if it&#8217;s any good&#8230; The purchase As usual with these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friend Daniel insisted I should have one of these, so I went and bought one from UK on ebay. Can you have enough of normal or short tele primes? ;) I started collecting Takumar lenses, so of course I needed the 135mm. Lets see if it&#8217;s any good&#8230;</p>
<div id="attachment_632" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-angle.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-632" title="super-takumar-135-angle" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-angle-340x255.jpg" alt="Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, angleview" width="340" height="255" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, angleview</p></div>
<p><strong>The purchase</strong><br />
As usual with these old manual lenses it wasn&#8217;t that much hat I payed, £8.50 + shipping £9.00. Later on I also got a hood from ebay, it need an original hood &#8211; makes a lot of difference. The hood was £7.95 + shipping £3. So if you buy a lens like this, get a hood too. Since I bought from a good seller in UK, there was no problem with shipping or the purchase. Avarage price on Pentaxforums.com is set to $38.<span id="more-631"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_633" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-back.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-633" title="super-takumar-135-back" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-back-340x253.jpg" alt="Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, mount" width="340" height="253" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, mount</p></div>
<p><strong>The lens</strong><br />
The Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 is a M42-lens, short telephoto prime. The production year I can find at the moment is 1966, but I guess it was made for several years. Construction is of metal and it feels very well built, like most of the Asahi-lenses from the 60&#8242;s.</p>
<p>I love the shape and the long focusring with a great grip. It has a switch for Auto/Manual and a small aperturepin &#8211; guessing that is for the Pentaxcameras. I haven&#8217;t tried it on my Spotmatic-camera, just on DSLR. The Auto/Manual-switch can be used to stopp the lens down/open it while focusing.</p>
<div id="attachment_634" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-front.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-634" title="super-takumar-135-front" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-front-333x340.jpg" alt="Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, front" width="333" height="340" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, front</p></div>
<p><strong>Results</strong><br />
My copy is sharp and has good very soft bokeh. Reading the opinions of others on the internet makes me think that there are quality difference in copies. Could also be an error behind the camera though, you never know for sure reading articles or posts on forums if it&#8217;s just a crap photographer ;) But as I said, I like the bokeh and sharpness. If you get the right depth of field this can be magic.</p>
<div id="attachment_635" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 350px"><a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-side.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-635" title="super-takumar-135-side" src="http://www.retrocamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/super-takumar-135-side-340x219.jpg" alt="Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, side" width="340" height="219" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Super Takumar 135mm/3.5, side</p></div>
<p>It is very easy to focus with, smooth and easy to see &#8211; which is great for a manual lens with f 3.5, slow manual lenses can often be hard to focus in a small viewfinder like my EOS 350D. The chromatic aberration is not that bad. It can be very sharp &#8211; wideopen it&#8217;s ok but stopped down even better.</p>
<p>I have this 135mm and a (Carl Zeiss) aus Jena Sonnar 135mm/3.5 in the Zebra version and have a hard time choosing. The Super-Takumar weighs a whole lot less comparing to the aus Jena, and is more tender built. I guess it&#8217;s mood of the day that decides which to go with. No doubt the buildquality in the Takumar is superior. I find it amazing how a 60&#8242;s lens can be in such good shape as ALL the Super-Takumar 135mm I&#8217;ve seen. The Pentax-people take care of their gear.</p>
<p><strong>Images</strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/2885945464_488b42eba7_o.jpg"><img title="Wood cranesbill" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3084/2885945464_0e2f6ee4ed.jpg" alt="Wood Cranesbill (Geranium sylvaticum)" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wood Cranesbill (Geranium sylvaticum)</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_4eb3684282_o.jpg"><img title="Nightime carpark" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_1bdd78aa66.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text"> </p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3146/2982113636_66b7a143bc_o.jpg"><img title="Bohemian waxwings" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3146/2982113636_a5e9a70fae.jpg" alt="Bohemian waxwings" width="500" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bohemian waxwings</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 385px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2981363853_7884d8b01c_o.jpg"><img title="Bohemian waxwing, 100% crop" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2981363853_9a9fb03988.jpg" alt="Bohemian waxwing, 100% crop" width="375" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Bohemian waxwing, 100% crop</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 360px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3177/2982247544_75858f3276_o.jpg"><img title="Portrait" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3177/2982247544_7be3783ed0.jpg" alt="Portrait" width="350" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Portrait</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3283/2887178444_5056f62058_o.jpg"><img title="Midsommarblomster" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3283/2887178444_0e8ceaacb0.jpg" alt="Midsommarblomster" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Midsommarblomster</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3143194333_2fbc65b075_o.jpg"><img title="Ice" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3143194333_836a37137c.jpg" alt="Ice" width="500" height="348" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Ice</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a rel="lightbox nofollow" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/2886344075_e82d09913b_o.jpg"><img title="Autumn road" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/2886344075_8c9d57754b.jpg" alt="Autumn road" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Autumn road</p></div>
<p><strong>Pros<br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Easy to focus</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Sharp</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Good bokeh</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Nice colours</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Good construction</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Cheap (well&#8230; depends of your luck of course)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #339966;">Easy to find</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Cons<span style="color: #ff0000;"><br />
</span></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Definately needs a hood, preferably original of course!</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000;">Contrast can be a bit lower then other Takumars in some circumstances, but that can be good thing.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Reading</strong></p>
<p><a title="On Pentaxforums" href="http://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/showproduct.php?product=277&amp;cat=24" target="_blank">Reviews on Pentax-forums</a><br />
<a title="On Mflenses" href="http://www.mflenses.com/index.php/Asahi-Pentax-Takumar/Asahi-Pentax-Super-Takumar-135mm-f/3.5-Lens-Review.html" target="_blank">Review on MFlenses</a><br />
<a title="On Pbase" href="http://www.pbase.com/knickles/tak135" target="_blank">PBase</a><br />
<a title="Jens Jacob at Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jakerollo/sets/72157604903903739/" target="_blank">Jens Jacob at Flickr</a></p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-pentacon-electric-135mm-f28-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2008">Review of Pentacon Electric 135mm f2.8 M42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-yashica-ml-50mm2.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 16, 2008">Review of Yashica ML 50mm/2</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 7.281 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fluffy sunset with lens Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/fluffy-sunset-with-lens-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/fluffy-sunset-with-lens-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 12:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s-m-c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today it&#8217;s snowstorm here. The last few days I have had the idea to do a 50mm battle (my armada of 50mm lenses is growing), but I never seem to get out and do it. Well, I have some images on storage since last shoot so&#8230; heres fluffy catched in backlight with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Multi-Coated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today it&#8217;s snowstorm here. The last few days I have had the idea to do a 50mm battle (my armada of 50mm lenses is growing), but I never seem to get out and do it. Well, I have some images on storage since last shoot so&#8230; heres fluffy catched in backlight with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Multi-Coated 55mm f1.8 M42-lens on the camera Canon EOS 350D:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3135/3047731233_b68351e179_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Fluffy sunset with this Pentax-lens" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3135/3047731233_f299e24869.jpg" title="Fluffy sunset with this Pentax-lens" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Fluffy sunset with this Pentax-lens</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/renewed-flickr-account-today.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 1, 2010">Renewed Flickr account today</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/thunder-awaits-us.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 13, 2009">Thunder awaits us</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 17, 2008">How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.233 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/fluffy-sunset-with-lens-asahi-s-m-c-takumar-55mm18.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Takumar photographs in the night</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[night]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of takumar-lenses used in the darkness of the night in this photographs. The first with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 and the second Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8, both on Canon EOS 350D. Similar Posts:Good read about M42-lenses A photowalk on 1 november Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42 Upcoming lensreview Review of Asahi Auto Takumar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of takumar-lenses used in the darkness of the night in this photographs. The first with Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 and the second Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8, both on Canon EOS 350D.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_4eb3684282_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3151/3016330200_1bdd78aa66.jpg" title="Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5" width="500" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Parkinglot shot with Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 342px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_4ee4c707d8_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3067/3010436012_d5abfbd695.jpg" title="House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8" width="332" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">House shot with Auto-Takumar 85mm/1.8</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/a-photowalk-on-1-november.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 2, 2008">A photowalk on 1 november</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 1, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/upcoming-lensreview.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 18, 2009">Upcoming lensreview</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-auto-takumar-85mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="December 8, 2008">Review of Asahi Auto Takumar 85mm/1.8</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.269 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/takumar-photographs-in-the-night.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sold my S-M-C Takumar 300mm/f4</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/sold-my-s-m-c-takumar-300mmf4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/sold-my-s-m-c-takumar-300mmf4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Selling and buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[300mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I sold my Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 300mm/f4. Needed the money and was my most valuable lens but the one I used the least. It was sold on swedish ebay &#8220;Tradera&#8221; for estimated $230. Similar Posts:Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8 Good read about M42-lenses Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42 Thunder awaits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I sold my Asahi Opt.Co. Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 300mm/f4. Needed the money and was my most valuable lens but the one I used the least. It was sold on swedish ebay &#8220;Tradera&#8221; for estimated $230.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3016395135_883a8552fc_o.jpg" rel="external"><img title="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3244/3016395135_2c39ea9a1f.jpg" alt="Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4" width="500" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Asahi S-M-C Takumar 300mm/4</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-asahi-super-multi-coated-takumar-55mm18.html" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2009">Review of Asahi S-M-C Takumar 55mm/1.8</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/good-read-about-m42-lenses.html" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2010">Good read about M42-lenses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/lens-for-sale-asahi-super-takumar-85mm1-9-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="April 1, 2012">Lens for sale: Asahi Super-Takumar 85mm/1.9 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/thunder-awaits-us.html" rel="bookmark" title="May 13, 2009">Thunder awaits us</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/my-little-digger.html" rel="bookmark" title="June 22, 2009">My little digger</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 4.347 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/sold-my-s-m-c-takumar-300mmf4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First try with Super Takumar 35mm/3.5 and macro-ring</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-try-with-super-takumar-35mm35-and-macro-ring.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-try-with-super-takumar-35mm35-and-macro-ring.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bragging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takumar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bought a Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5 from a friend on the net, zewrak. It looks and feels very nice! Gave it a couples tries, today with macroring and one of our sunflowers. Similar Posts:Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5 How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens First [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5 from a friend on the net, zewrak. It looks and feels very nice! Gave it a couples tries, today with macroring and one of our sunflowers.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_0c14172577_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Super Takumar 35mm/3.5" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3147/2723858814_13deb684ab_m.jpg" title="Super Takumar 35mm/3.5" width="240" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 343px"><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_886cc4481c_o.jpg" rel="lightbox"><img alt="Sunflower" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3108/2723858830_8d9df6be07.jpg" title="Sunflower" width="333" height="500" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sunflower</p></div>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentax-super-takumar-35mm35.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Review of Pentax Super Takumar 35mm/3.5</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/how-to-remember-your-manual-lenses-without-exif.html" rel="bookmark" title="August 17, 2008">How to remember your manual lenses without EXIF</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-asahi-super-takumar-135mm35-m42-lens.html" rel="bookmark" title="March 20, 2009">Review of Asahi Super-Takumar 135mm/3.5 M42-lens</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/first-test-with-pentax-super-takumar-28mm35-m42.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 4, 2008">First test with Pentax Super Takumar 28mm/3.5 m42</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.retrocamera.net/the-early-tokina-that-came-with-my-spotmatic.html" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2008">The early Tokina that came with my Spotmatic</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.002 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.retrocamera.net/first-try-with-super-takumar-35mm35-and-macro-ring.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

