<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yashicas &#8211; they are always beautiful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-18</guid>
		<description>To bad about the 135mm. The DX 50mm/1.7 seems to have very soft, milky bokeh... check this out, tried it yesterday: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2735463535/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To bad about the 135mm. The DX 50mm/1.7 seems to have very soft, milky bokeh&#8230; check this out, tried it yesterday: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2735463535/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattiaswirf/2735463535/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Hello Mattias !

I took a quick look yesterday evening and the lens is a M42 screw mount Auto Yashinon DX 50mm 1:1.7-16... so I think it is the same that you have.

The 135mm was so broken that it was no use to even try repairing it :-( It has now passed on... to lens heaven ;-)

Regards, Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mattias !</p>
<p>I took a quick look yesterday evening and the lens is a M42 screw mount Auto Yashinon DX 50mm 1:1.7-16&#8230; so I think it is the same that you have.</p>
<p>The 135mm was so broken that it was no use to even try repairing it :-( It has now passed on&#8230; to lens heaven ;-)</p>
<p>Regards, Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait to try on the ML, just wish my adapter will come from china today.... but if I&#039;m realistic it will probably take more days shipping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait to try on the ML, just wish my adapter will come from china today&#8230;. but if I&#8217;m realistic it will probably take more days shipping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Nuttall (Poolhall)</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Nuttall (Poolhall)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I have a TL-Electro and its one of my favourite cameras good, solid, robust m-42,takes millions of lenses, and works whatever, the Yashinon dx lenses are pretty good too but the ML are better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a TL-Electro and its one of my favourite cameras good, solid, robust m-42,takes millions of lenses, and works whatever, the Yashinon dx lenses are pretty good too but the ML are better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Nice :) What is the name on the lenses? The ML lenses are good, my DX 50mm/1.7 also feels good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice :) What is the name on the lenses? The ML lenses are good, my DX 50mm/1.7 also feels good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/yashicas-they-are-always-beautiful.html/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=94#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hello again Mattias !

This time I am going to write my comment in english ;-)

I have also got an &quot;new&quot; Yashica SLR - an Yashica TL-Super - that I found
this saturday when I visited Loppmarknaden in Vårby. I got the camera incl.
a 50 mm lens and a 135 mm lens for 100 SEK.

Unfortenetly, as I found out when I got home, the 135 mm lens was broken really bad... but i still think it was a fair price. I will have to check the 50 mm lens later today but I think it is OK... anyway, the camera body was fine.

Regards, Thomas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello again Mattias !</p>
<p>This time I am going to write my comment in english ;-)</p>
<p>I have also got an &#8220;new&#8221; Yashica SLR &#8211; an Yashica TL-Super &#8211; that I found<br />
this saturday when I visited Loppmarknaden in Vårby. I got the camera incl.<br />
a 50 mm lens and a 135 mm lens for 100 SEK.</p>
<p>Unfortenetly, as I found out when I got home, the 135 mm lens was broken really bad&#8230; but i still think it was a fair price. I will have to check the 50 mm lens later today but I think it is OK&#8230; anyway, the camera body was fine.</p>
<p>Regards, Thomas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

