<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Pentacon Auto 50mm/1.8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html</link>
	<description>Old retrocamera equipment in a digital photography world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:09:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Branford</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-17102</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Branford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-17102</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I discovered your blog via Google while looking for very first help to get a heart assault and your post
looks incredibly fascinating for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I discovered your blog via Google while looking for very first help to get a heart assault and your post<br />
looks incredibly fascinating for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davide</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-8807</link>
		<dc:creator>davide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-8807</guid>
		<description>This is a great lens!!!! Warm colors, precise focusing, excellent from 0,3 meters to infinity! I use often with my old praktica LB, bought used in the &#039;90 and still 100% working</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great lens!!!! Warm colors, precise focusing, excellent from 0,3 meters to infinity! I use often with my old praktica LB, bought used in the &#8217;90 and still 100% working</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>I kind of like the sharper to the middle effect sometime (depending on what I shoot) :) This is also a lens I&#039;m not afraid to bump a little, since it is already dented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like the sharper to the middle effect sometime (depending on what I shoot) :) This is also a lens I&#8217;m not afraid to bump a little, since it is already dented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Christophe</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-3836</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Christophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-3836</guid>
		<description>The 50mm Pentacon is an overall good obj. It is, on my opinion, easy to use, sharp enough (in the middle of image), with a nice bokeh and with good colour rendering in the Multi Coating version. However, when I compare the performance of this lens with some other lenses, for example the Fujinon 50mm, the Pentacon is less precise at the corner of image and globaly less performant. But for the price this lens can be found on ebay, it is a good bargain. Would say 3,5/5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 50mm Pentacon is an overall good obj. It is, on my opinion, easy to use, sharp enough (in the middle of image), with a nice bokeh and with good colour rendering in the Multi Coating version. However, when I compare the performance of this lens with some other lenses, for example the Fujinon 50mm, the Pentacon is less precise at the corner of image and globaly less performant. But for the price this lens can be found on ebay, it is a good bargain. Would say 3,5/5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>Nice :) I think it is the lens which has the best combination of price and performence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice :) I think it is the lens which has the best combination of price and performence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sreekanth</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sreekanth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>I have the same lens.. bought in ebay for &lt;10$ ..Its just amazing. It replaced my sigma 17-70 on my canon 20D .. all my pics now are taken used it.

yes..the close focus is really great .. and the bokeh is very nice too :).. I&#039;m lucky that my lens is mechanically also in grt condition.. only a  small fungus mark on the rear element,it doesn&#039;t effect the picture quality though..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same lens.. bought in ebay for &lt;10$ ..Its just amazing. It replaced my sigma 17-70 on my canon 20D .. all my pics now are taken used it.</p>
<p>yes..the close focus is really great .. and the bokeh is very nice too :).. I&#039;m lucky that my lens is mechanically also in grt condition.. only a  small fungus mark on the rear element,it doesn&#039;t effect the picture quality though..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: parket</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-974</link>
		<dc:creator>parket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-974</guid>
		<description>:-]]  rock and roll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-]]  rock and roll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-904</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-904</guid>
		<description>Really great find!  Very usable lens.  I enjoyed your photos very much: all well done.  I&#039;m curious, though, about the coatings on this lens.  In the branches shot near the end of your series, flare and ghosting seem to be well under control.  No ghosts I can see and flare is only slight to moderate, and put to nice use in the composition also.  Any comments on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great find!  Very usable lens.  I enjoyed your photos very much: all well done.  I&#8217;m curious, though, about the coatings on this lens.  In the branches shot near the end of your series, flare and ghosting seem to be well under control.  No ghosts I can see and flare is only slight to moderate, and put to nice use in the composition also.  Any comments on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattias</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-853</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark, yes that&#039;s my daughter :) Too cute sometimes, hard to say no to ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark, yes that&#8217;s my daughter :) Too cute sometimes, hard to say no to ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Forman</title>
		<link>http://www.retrocamera.net/review-of-pentacon-auto-50mm1-8.html/comment-page-1#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Forman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retrocamera.net/?p=831#comment-849</guid>
		<description>OK I have flea market bargain envy! Is that your child in the happy shot? A beauty in any case. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK I have flea market bargain envy! Is that your child in the happy shot? A beauty in any case. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

